Rapid systematic reviews for synthesizing research on built environment
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Rapid systematic reviews for synthesizing research on built environment
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Environmental Development
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 100730
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2022-05-28
DOI
10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100730
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
- (2021) Rose E. O'Dea et al. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis
- (2021) Julian Elliott et al. NATURE
- Ignoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analyses
- (2020) Ko Konno et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2020) Hannah Ewald et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews
- (2020) Lisa Affengruber et al. Systematic Reviews
- Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews
- (2020) Candyce Hamel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
- (2020) Chantelle Garritty et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Few evaluative studies exist examining rapid review methodology across stages of conduct: a systematic scoping review
- (2020) Candyce Hamel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
- (2020) Chantelle Garritty et al. PLoS One
- How agile project management can work for your research
- (2019) Laura Pirro NATURE
- A visualized overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on low-carbon built environments: An evidence review map
- (2019) Gihan Samarasinghe et al. SOLAR ENERGY
- Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
- (2019) Marina Krnic Martinic et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2019) B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews
- (2018) Emily Reynen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2018) B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- OUP accepted manuscript
- (2018) BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
- Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
- (2018) Zachary Munn et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2018) Iain Marshall et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Using rapid reviews: an example from a study conducted to inform policy-making
- (2017) Denise F. O'Leary et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
- (2017) Rohit Borah et al. BMJ Open
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparison of a full systematic review versus rapid review approaches to assess a newborn screening test for tyrosinemia type 1
- (2017) Sian Taylor-Phillips et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Systematic reviews: Separating fact from fiction
- (2016) Neal R. Haddaway et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- (2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health
- (2016) Mai T. Pham et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review
- (2016) Ahmed M. Abou-Setta et al. PLoS One
- Shades of grey: Two forms of grey literature important for reviews in conservation
- (2015) Neal R. Haddaway et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- A scoping review of rapid review methods
- (2015) Andrea C. Tricco et al. BMC Medicine
- Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies
- (2015) Michelle M. Haby et al. Implementation Science
- Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: A methodology
- (2014) Paul Woodcock et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes
- (2014) Tracey J. Woodruff et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies
- (2014) Gary S. Bilotta et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
- RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- (2014) Sara Khangura et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Improving Current Practice in Reviews of the Built Environment and Physical Activity
- (2014) Klaus Gebel et al. SPORTS MEDICINE
- The use of systematic reviews to analyse demand-side management policy
- (2013) Peter Warren Energy Efficiency
- Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits
- (2013) Quenby Mahood et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?
- (2010) Amber Watt et al. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
- (2010) Rebecca Ganann et al. Implementation Science
- Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'
- (2009) Tracy Merlin et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist
- (2009) Andrea C. Tricco et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment
- (2008) Amber Watt et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: Knowledge transfer for policy and practice
- (2008) Kiera Keown et al. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started