Exploring the Relationship Between Ethics and Trust in Human–Artificial Intelligence Teaming: A Mixed Methods Approach
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Exploring the Relationship Between Ethics and Trust in Human–Artificial Intelligence Teaming: A Mixed Methods Approach
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 155534342211139
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2022-08-02
DOI
10.1177/15553434221113964
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Trust and Team Performance in Human–Autonomy Teaming
- (2021) Nathan J. McNeese et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
- Trust repair in human-agent teams: the effectiveness of explanations and expressing regret
- (2021) E. S. Kox et al. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS
- How should intelligent agents apologize to restore trust? Interaction effects between anthropomorphism and apology attribution on trust repair
- (2021) Taenyun Kim et al. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
- Team Situation Awareness and Conflict: A Study of Human–Machine Teaming
- (2021) Nathan J. McNeese et al. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
- Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming
- (2021) Mustafa Demir et al. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
- Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
- (2020) Thomas O’Neill et al. HUMAN FACTORS
- Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice
- (2020) Ben Shneiderman ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
- DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program
- (2019) David Gunning et al. AI MAGAZINE
- Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams
- (2019) Ewart J. de Visser et al. International Journal of Social Robotics
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
- (2019) Alejandro Barredo Arrieta et al. Information Fusion
- From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction
- (2018) Ewart J. de Visser et al. ERGONOMICS
- Self-driving car dilemmas reveal that moral choices are not universal
- (2018) Amy Maxmen NATURE
- Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming
- (2017) Nathan J. McNeese et al. HUMAN FACTORS
- From Here to Autonomy
- (2016) Mica R. Endsley HUMAN FACTORS
- A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation
- (2016) Kristin E. Schaefer et al. HUMAN FACTORS
- Trust in Automation
- (2014) Kevin Anthony Hoff et al. HUMAN FACTORS
- Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults
- (2012) Richard Pak et al. ERGONOMICS
- Technology-Mediated Collaboration, Shared Mental Model and Task Performance
- (2012) Hayward P. Andres Journal of Organizational and End User Computing
- A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
- (2011) Peter A. Hancock et al. HUMAN FACTORS
- Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration
- (2010) Raja Parasuraman et al. HUMAN FACTORS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started