Target‐group backgrounds prove effective at correcting sampling bias in Maxent models
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Target‐group backgrounds prove effective at correcting sampling bias in Maxent models
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 128-141
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2021-11-19
DOI
10.1111/ddi.13442
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Correcting the effect of sampling bias in species distribution modeling – A new method in the case of a low number of presence data
- (2020) Yi Moua et al. Ecological Informatics
- Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy
- (2020) Poliana Mendes et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Testing methods in species distribution modelling using virtual species: what have we learnt and what are we missing?
- (2019) Christine N. Meynard et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Bunching up the background betters bias in species distribution models
- (2019) Julien Vollering et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Accessibility maps as a tool to predict sampling bias in historical biodiversity occurrence records
- (2018) Sophie Monsarrat et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Without quality presence-absence data, discrimination metrics such as TSS can be misleading measures of model performance
- (2018) Boris Leroy et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics
- (2017) Yoan Fourcade et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas
- (2017) Stephen E. Fick et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
- Performance tradeoffs in target-group bias correction for species distribution models
- (2016) Nathan Ranc et al. ECOGRAPHY
- virtualspecies, an R package to generate virtual species distributions
- (2015) Boris Leroy et al. ECOGRAPHY
- spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models
- (2015) Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Accounting for spatially biased sampling effort in presence-only species distribution modelling
- (2014) Jessica Stolar et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models
- (2014) Robert A. Boria et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Mapping Species Distributions with MAXENT Using a Geographically Biased Sample of Presence Data: A Performance Assessment of Methods for Correcting Sampling Bias
- (2014) Yoan Fourcade et al. PLoS One
- Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species
- (2014) William Fithian et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models
- (2013) Stephanie Kramer-Schadt et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter
- (2013) Cory Merow et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Selecting from correlated climate variables: a major source of uncertainty for predicting species distributions under climate change
- (2013) Veronika Braunisch et al. ECOGRAPHY
- A spatially explicit methodology fora prioriestimation of field survey effort in environmental observation networks
- (2013) Carlos Guerra et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE
- Making better Maxentmodels of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation
- (2013) Aleksandar Radosavljevic et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- The Effects of Sampling Bias and Model Complexity on the Predictive Performance of MaxEnt Species Distribution Models
- (2013) Mindy M. Syfert et al. PLoS One
- Model-Based Control of Observer Bias for the Analysis of Presence-Only Data in Ecology
- (2013) David I. Warton et al. PLoS One
- Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling
- (2012) Pelayo Acevedo et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
- (2012) Morgane Barbet-Massin et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Presence-only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences?
- (2012) Charles B. Yackulic et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling
- (2011) Narayani Barve et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent
- (2011) Robert P. Anderson et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Quantitative metrics of overlaps in Grinnellian niches: advances and possible drawbacks
- (2011) D. Rödder et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
- (2010) Jane Elith et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling
- (2010) Jorge M. Lobo et al. ECOGRAPHY
- The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela
- (2010) Robert P. Anderson et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models
- (2010) Tim Newbold PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
- The art of modelling range-shifting species
- (2010) Jane Elith et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time
- (2009) Jane Elith et al. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
- Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know?
- (2009) Jeremy VanDerWal et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models
- (2009) Samuel D. Veloz JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions
- (2009) J. Soberon et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Usefulness of Bioclimatic Models for Studying Climate Change and Invasive Species
- (2008) Jonathan M. Jeschke et al. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
- (2008) M. S. Wisz et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007)
- (2008) Steven J. Phillips ECOGRAPHY
- ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE EQUIVALENCY VERSUS CONSERVATISM: QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO NICHE EVOLUTION
- (2008) Dan L. Warren et al. EVOLUTION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search