Bunching up the background betters bias in species distribution models
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Bunching up the background betters bias in species distribution models
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ECOGRAPHY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-06-21
DOI
10.1111/ecog.04503
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Why understanding the pioneering and continuing contributions of BIOCLIM to species distribution modelling is important
- (2018) Trevor H. Booth AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
- Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics
- (2017) Yoan Fourcade et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas
- (2017) Stephen E. Fick et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
- Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas
- (2017) Dirk Nikolaus Karger et al. Scientific Data
- Performance tradeoffs in target-group bias correction for species distribution models
- (2016) Nathan Ranc et al. ECOGRAPHY
- How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt?
- (2016) Rune Halvorsen et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Integrating occurrence data and expert maps for improved species range predictions
- (2016) Cory Merow et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Improving niche and range estimates with Maxent and point process models by integrating spatially explicit information
- (2016) Cory Merow et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models
- (2015) Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Point process models for presence-only analysis
- (2015) Ian W. Renner et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Accounting for spatially biased sampling effort in presence-only species distribution modelling
- (2014) Jessica Stolar et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models
- (2014) Sara Varela et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Opportunities for improved distribution modelling practice via a strict maximum likelihood interpretation of MaxEnt
- (2014) Rune Halvorsen et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models
- (2014) Robert A. Boria et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Mapping Species Distributions with MAXENT Using a Geographically Biased Sample of Presence Data: A Performance Assessment of Methods for Correcting Sampling Bias
- (2014) Yoan Fourcade et al. PLoS One
- Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species
- (2014) William Fithian et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Finite-sample equivalence in statistical models for presence-only data
- (2013) William Fithian et al. Annals of Applied Statistics
- The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models
- (2013) Stephanie Kramer-Schadt et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter
- (2013) Cory Merow et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species' geographic distributions
- (2013) Jan Beck et al. Ecological Informatics
- On estimating probability of presence from use–availability or presence–background data
- (2013) Steven J. Phillips et al. ECOLOGY
- Making better Maxentmodels of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation
- (2013) Aleksandar Radosavljevic et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Improving Transferability of Introduced Species’ Distribution Models: New Tools to Forecast the Spread of a Highly Invasive Seaweed
- (2013) Heroen Verbruggen et al. PLoS One
- Model-Based Control of Observer Bias for the Analysis of Presence-Only Data in Ecology
- (2013) David I. Warton et al. PLoS One
- Predicting the distribution of the Asian tapir in Peninsular Malaysia using maximum entropy modeling
- (2012) Gopalasamy Reuben CLEMENTS et al. Integrative Zoology
- Presence-only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences?
- (2012) Charles B. Yackulic et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling
- (2011) Alberto Jiménez-Valverde GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Incorporating uncertainty in predictive species distribution modelling
- (2011) C. M. Beale et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Comparative interpretation of count, presence-absence and point methods for species distribution models
- (2011) Geert Aarts et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Assessing the Geographic Representativeness of Genebank Collections: the Case of Bolivian Wild Potatoes
- (2010) R. J. Hijmans et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers
- (2010) Damaris Zurell et al. OIKOS
- The art of modelling range-shifting species
- (2010) Jane Elith et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data
- (2009) Steven J. Phillips et al. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
- Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models
- (2009) Samuel D. Veloz JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE EQUIVALENCY VERSUS CONSERVATISM: QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO NICHE EVOLUTION
- (2008) Dan L. Warren et al. EVOLUTION
- AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
- (2007) Jorge M. Lobo et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started