4.6 Review

Immune Escape by Non-coding RNAs of the Epstein Barr Virus

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.657387

Keywords

T cells; NK cells; antigen processing; MHC presentation; humanized mice

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Switzerland [KFS-4962-02-2020]
  2. CRPP-PrecisionMS and HMZ ImmunoTargET of the University of Zurich
  3. Cancer Research Center Zurich
  4. Baugarten Foundation
  5. Sobek Foundation
  6. Swiss Vaccine Research Institute
  7. Roche
  8. Novartis
  9. Novartis Foundation [20B099]
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030B_182827, 310030L_197952/1, CRSII5_180323]
  11. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030L_197952] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EBV is one of the most successful pathogens of humans, persistently colonizing over 95% of the adult human population. It encodes oncogenes and has reached a stalemate with cytotoxic and innate lymphocytes for persistence in infected humans.
Epstein Barr virus (EBV) is one of the most successful pathogens of humans, persistently colonizing more than 95% of the adult human population. At the same time EBV encodes oncogenes that can readily transform human B cells in culture and threaten healthy virus carriers with lymphomagenesis. Cytotoxic lymphocytes have been identified in experimental models and by primary immunodeficiencies as the main protective immune compartments controlling EBV. EBV has reached a stalemate with these cytotoxic T and innate lymphocytes to ensure persistence in most infected humans. Recent evidence suggests that the non-coding RNAs of the virus contribute to viral immune escape to prevent immune eradication. This knowledge might be used in the future to attenuate EBV for vaccine development against this human tumor virus that was discovered more than 55 years ago.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available