Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Treatment guidelines, Metaanalysis, Database searching, Medical risk factors, Screening guidelines, Conflicts of interest, Health care policy
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages e0250356
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2021-04-23
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0250356
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Impact and use of reviews and ‘overviews of reviews’ to inform clinical practice guideline recommendations: protocol for a methods study
- (2020) Carole Lunny et al. BMJ Open
- Factors Associated With High-Quality Guidelines for the Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Diseases in Primary Care
- (2019) Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Levels of Evidence Supporting American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, 2008-2018
- (2019) Alexander C. Fanaroff et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Failure to place evidence at the centre of quality improvement remains a major barrier for advances in quality improvement
- (2019) Benjamin Djulbegovic et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Evidence vs Consensus in Clinical Practice Guidelines
- (2019) Benjamin Djulbegovic et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality
- (2018) Sofia Sideri et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
- (2018) Chase Meyer et al. PLoS One
- A unifying framework for improving health care
- (2018) Benjamin Djulbegovic et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: A systematic review
- (2017) Caroline van den Ende et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Improvement evident but still necessary in clinical practice guideline quality: a systematic review
- (2017) James Jacob Armstrong et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT
- (2017) Holger J. Schünemann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic review of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Implications for research and policy
- (2017) Arjun K. Venkatesh et al. PLoS One
- Do guidelines for treating chest disease in children use Cochrane Reviews effectively? A systematic review
- (2017) Andrew P Prayle et al. THORAX
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- (2016) Albert L. Siu et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT Statement
- (2016) Yaolong Chen et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play
- (2016) Tamara Kredo et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research
- (2015) Frances Bunn et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO
- (2014) D Moher et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- To what extent are current guidelines for cutaneous melanoma follow up based on scientific evidence?
- (2014) N. J. Marciano et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
- How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
- (2014) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials
- (2013) Karen A. Robinson et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines
- (2013) Amir Qaseem ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise
- (2013) H. J. Schunemann et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews
- (2013) Rebecca M. Turner et al. PLoS One
- Failure of Clinical Practice Guidelines to Meet Institute of Medicine Standards
- (2012) Justin Kung et al. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Methods for the Drug Effectiveness Review Project
- (2012) Marian S McDonagh et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations
- (2012) Steven Woolf et al. Implementation Science
- Guidelines for Guidelines: Are They Up to the Task? A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbooks
- (2012) Shabnam Ansari et al. PLoS One
- Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed
- (2011) Tianjing Li et al. BMC Medicine
- Scientific Evidence Underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologistsʼ Practice Bulletins
- (2011) Jason D. Wright et al. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting
- (2010) Mike Clarke et al. LANCET
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines
- (2009) J. L. Brożek et al. ALLERGY
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual: A Quality-Driven Approach for Translating Evidence into Action
- (2009) Richard M. Rosenfeld et al. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started