Methods for the Drug Effectiveness Review Project

Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence

(2011) Kim Peterson et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program

(2011) Susan L. Norris et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

(2009) S. J. Edwards et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2009) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified

(2008) J. P T Higgins   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Direct versus indirect comparisons: A summary of the evidence

(2008) Gerald Gartlehner et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE

AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program

(2008) Roger Chou et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

(2007) F. Song et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY