The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis

(2011) Gerta Rücker et al.   BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL

Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis

(2011) Jonathan Davey et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study

(2011) Kristian Thorlund et al.   PLoS One

Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison

(2010) Elizabeth L. C. Merrall et al.   ADDICTION

Could It Be Better to Discard 90% of the Data? A Statistical Paradox

(2010) T. D. Stanley et al.   AMERICAN STATISTICIAN

The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests

(2009) George F. Borm et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment

(2008) Amber Watt et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE

Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses

(2008) Jesper Brok et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Bias modelling in evidence synthesis

(2008) Rebecca M. Turner et al.   JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY

Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis

(2007) Jørn Wetterslev et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

In the Era of Systematic Reviews, Does the Size of an Individual Trial Still Matter?

(2007) Gordon H Guyatt et al.   PLOS MEDICINE