- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations
Authors
Keywords
Research design, Statistical models, Coding mechanisms, Peer review, Social psychology, Clinical trials, Preprocessing, Reproducibility
Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages e3000937
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2020-12-10
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000937
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size
- (2020) Marjan Bakker et al. PLoS One
- COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
- (2019) Ben Goldacre et al. Trials
- Preregistering qualitative research
- (2019) Tamarinde L. Haven et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- What’s next for Registered Reports?
- (2019) Chris Chambers NATURE
- Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
- (2019) Brian A. Nosek et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature
- (2018) Jenny T. van der Steen et al. PLoS One
- The preregistration revolution
- (2018) Brian A. Nosek et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established
- (2017) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters
- (2017) John PA Ioannidis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters
- (2017) John PA Ioannidis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs
- (2017) M Lancee et al. Translational Psychiatry
- Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists
- (2017) Franca Agnoli et al. PLoS One
- Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review
- (2017) Cole Wayant et al. PLoS One
- Make journals report clinical trials properly
- (2016) Ben Goldacre NATURE
- Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology
- (2015) Klaas Sijtsma et al. PSYCHOMETRIKA
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time
- (2015) Robert M. Kaplan et al. PLoS One
- Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known
- (2014) Christopher D. Chambers ADDICTION
- The Statistical Crisis in Science
- (2014) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
- (2012) Christopher D. Chambers CORTEX
- Characteristics of Clinical Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010
- (2012) Robert M. Califf JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
- (2008) John P. A. Ioannidis EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Bias, Spin, and Misreporting: Time for Full Access to Trial Protocols and Results
- (2008) An-Wen Chan PLOS MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started