Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size

The preregistration revolution

(2018) Brian A. Nosek et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.

(2018) T. D. Stanley et al.   PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN

Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature

(2017) Denes Szucs et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

A Bayesian bird's eye view of ‘Replications of important results in social psychology’

(2017) Maarten Marsman et al.   Royal Society Open Science

Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists

(2017) Franca Agnoli et al.   PLoS One

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

(2015)   SCIENCE

Promoting an open research culture

(2015) B. A. Nosek et al.   SCIENCE

Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex

(2012) Christopher D. Chambers   CORTEX

“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

(2010) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

(2009) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One