Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature
Authors
Keywords
Taxonomy, Research design, Database searching, Finance, Research laboratories, Clinical trials, Publication ethics, Systematic reviews
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages e0188247
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-02-06
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0188247
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
- (2016) Dirk Bassler et al. BMJ Open
- Non-Publication Is Common among Phase 1, Single-Center, Not Prospectively Registered, or Early Terminated Clinical Drug Trials
- (2016) Cornelis A. van den Bogert et al. PLoS One
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
- (2015) Malcolm R. Macleod et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Rationale for WHO's New Position Calling for Prompt Reporting and Public Disclosure of Interventional Clinical Trial Results
- (2015) Vasee S. Moorthy et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research
- (2014) Bridget C. O’Brien et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
- (2013) JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study
- (2013) Mojtaba Vaismoradi et al. Nursing & Health Sciences
- Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis
- (2013) C. W. Jones et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO
- (2011) Kay Dickersin et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review
- (2010) Natalie McGauran et al. Trials
- Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy
- (2010) Emily S. Sena et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Accounting for uncertainty about investigator bias: disclosure is informative: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?
- (2009) S. Greenland JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
- (2009) Joseph S. Ross et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Publication bias in qualitative research: what becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences?
- (2008) M Petticrew et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now