Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-09-14
DOI
10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020
- (2020) Mary B. Daly et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results
- (2019) Yvonne Bombard et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2
- (2019) Chloe Mighton et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies
- (2019) Jill O. Robinson et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Disclosure of cardiac variants of uncertain significance results in an exome cohort
- (2018) T.A. Lawal et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients
- (2018) Holly J. Pederson et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Factors influencing the decision to share cancer genetic results among family members: An in-depth interview study of women in an Asian setting
- (2018) Shao-Tzu Li et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Psychological impact of multigene cancer panel testing in patients with a clinical suspicion of hereditary cancer across Spain
- (2018) I. Esteban et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing
- (2018) Jacqueline Mersch et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR) Questionnaire: Development and Preliminary Validation
- (2018) Meng Li et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Recontacting clinical genetics patients with reclassified results: equity and policy challenges
- (2018) Yvonne Bombard et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
- (2018) Karen L. David et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Attitudes, knowledge and consequences of uncertain genetic findings in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- (2017) Charlotte Burns et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Recontacting in clinical practice: the views and expectations of patients in the United Kingdom
- (2017) Daniele Carrieri et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- A 'joint venture' model of recontacting in clinical genomics: challenges for responsible implementation
- (2017) Sandi Dheensa et al. European Journal of Medical Genetics
- “Possibly positive or certainly uncertain?”: participants’ responses to uncertain diagnostic results from exome sequencing
- (2017) Debra Skinner et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic
- (2017) Sarah Macklin et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing Into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
- (2017) Allison W. Kurian et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Lynch Syndrome Limbo: Patient Understanding of Variants of Uncertain Significance
- (2017) Ilana Solomon et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Examining the Psychosocial Impact of Genetic Testing for Cardiomyopathies
- (2017) Julia Wynn et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients
- (2017) Heidi S. Lumish et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine
- (2016) Ainsley J. Newson et al. BMC Medical Genomics
- Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program
- (2016) David J. Hermel et al. Familial Cancer
- Patient Recall, Interpretation, and Perspective of an Inconclusive Long QT Syndrome Genetic Test Result
- (2016) Sarah Predham et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Patient feedback and early outcome data with a novel tiered-binned model for multiplex breast cancer susceptibility testing
- (2015) Angela R. Bradbury et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
- (2015) Sue Richards et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Adverse Events in Cancer Genetic Testing
- (2014) Danielle C. Bonadies et al. CANCER JOURNAL
- Variants of uncertain significance inBRCAtesting: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress
- (2013) JO Culver et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- The integration of next-generation sequencing panels in the clinical cancer genetics practice: an institutional experience
- (2013) Caitlin B. Mauer et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- “Grasping the Grey”: Patient Understanding and Interpretation of an Intermediate Allele Predictive Test Result for Huntington Disease
- (2012) A. Semaka et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Distress among women receiving uninformativeBRCA1/2results: 12-month outcomes
- (2009) Suzanne C. O'Neill et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The counsellees' view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life
- (2007) Joël Vos et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started