Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey

Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study

(2018) Long Ge et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Relationships between abstract features and methodological quality explained variations of social media activity derived from systematic reviews about psoriasis interventions

(2018) J. Ruano et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis

(2018) Matthew J. Page et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations

(2018) Chang Xu et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses of Hyperthyroidism Treatment

(2017) Yahong Qin et al.   HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH

Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

(2017) Francisco Gómez-García et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality: A flexible, non-linear, meta-regression of 40 prospective cohort studies

(2017) Tong-Zu Liu et al.   SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

(2017) Beverley J Shea et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

(2017) Beverley J Shea et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods

(2016) Jason R. Guertin et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold!

(2016) Adam Weir et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE

Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants

(2016) Shanil Ebrahim et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Prevalence of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Autopsy Studies Over Six Decades: A Meta-Analysis

(2016) Luis Furuya-Kanamori et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

(2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS   MILBANK QUARTERLY

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

(2015) L. Shamseer et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

(2015) L. Shamseer et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies

(2013) K. C. Siontis et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Meta-Analysis for Linear and Nonlinear Dose-Response Relations: Examples, an Evaluation of Approximations, and Software

(2011) Nicola Orsini et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

A two-stage hierarchical regression model for meta-analysis of epidemiologic nonlinear dose–response data

(2009) Qin Liu et al.   COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

(2009) Alessandro Liberati et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY