Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-33
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2020-09-10
DOI
10.1080/08989621.2020.1822170
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline
- (2018) Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo et al. Biochemia Medica
- A community’s perspective on the status and future of peer review in software engineering
- (2018) Lutz Prechelt et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- Essential medicines availability is still suboptimal in many countries: a scoping review
- (2018) Mersiha Mahmić-Kaknjo et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015)
- (2018) Francisco Grimaldo et al. PLoS One
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
- (2018) Amytis Heim et al. BMC Medicine
- The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals
- (2018) Federico Bianchi et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
- (2017) Rafael D’Andrea et al. PLoS One
- The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor
- (2017) J. A. García et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution
- (2017) Charles W. Fox SCIENTOMETRICS
- The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
- (2016) Michail Kovanis et al. PLoS One
- Authors and reviewers who suffer from confirmatory bias
- (2016) J. A. García et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Recognition for peer review
- (2016) Zoë Mullan Lancet Global Health
- Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
- (2016) Jelte M. Wicherts PLoS One
- Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data
- (2015) Michail Kovanis et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
- (2015) Richard Walker et al. Frontiers in Neuroscience
- What motivates people to review articles? The case of the human-computer interaction community
- (2015) Syavash Nobarany et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals
- (2015) Vivian M. Nguyen et al. PLoS One
- Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism
- (2014) Mario Paolucci et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review
- (2013) In-Uck Park et al. NATURE
- Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing
- (2011) Wendy L. Lipworth et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors
- (2010) Douglas P. Newton Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- How to do a meta-analysis
- (2010) Andy P. Field et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Publish or perish, but at what cost?
- (2008) Ushma S. Neill JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Experience, Time Investment, and Motivators of Nursing Journal Peer Reviewers
- (2008) Margaret H. Kearney et al. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started