Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies

(2014) Stephen A. Gallo et al.   PLoS One

Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities

(2013) Roger Chun-Man Ho et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Open access: The true cost of science publishing

(2013) Richard Van Noorden   NATURE

Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

(2013) John Bohannon   SCIENCE

A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals

(2013) David J. Solomon et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure

(2012) Mikael Laakso et al.   BMC Medicine

Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers

(2012) Adrian Mulligan et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Predatory publishers are corrupting open access

(2012) Jeffrey Beall   NATURE

As Open Access Explodes, How to Tell the Good From the Bad and the Ugly?

(2012) M. Enserink   SCIENCE

Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science

(2012) Jelte M. Wicherts et al.   Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants

(2010) Lutz Bornmann et al.   PLoS One

Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests

(2010) Primož Južnič et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS