Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Scientific Reports
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-02-21
DOI
10.1038/s41598-020-59919-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry
- (2019) Jinhai Huang et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers
- (2019) Francesco Sabatino et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
- (2018) Ronald B. Melles et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes
- (2018) Yanjun Hua et al. PLoS One
- Agreement between lens thickness measurements by ultrasound immersion biometry and optical biometry
- (2018) Giacomo Savini et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Twenty-five years of optical coherence tomography: the paradigm shift in sensitivity and speed provided by Fourier domain OCT [Invited]
- (2017) Johannes F. de Boer et al. Biomedical Optics Express
- Ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using swept-source optical coherence tomography
- (2017) Teresa Ferrer-Blasco et al. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster
- (2016) Jinhai Huang et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters
- (2016) Teresa Ferrer-Blasco et al. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence–length swept-source optical coherence tomographer
- (2016) H. John Shammas et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas
- (2016) Jack X. Kane et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry
- (2016) Kenneth J. Hoffer et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes
- (2016) Yichi Zhang et al. Journal of Ophthalmology
- Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients
- (2015) Susanne Goebels et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer
- (2015) Sabong Srivannaboon et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Involving 148 Eyes with Long Axial Lengths: A Retrospective Chart-Review Study
- (2015) Chong Chen et al. Journal of Ophthalmology
- Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
- (2014) Sabong Srivannaboon et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology
- (2011) Colm McAlinden et al. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started