Article
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Hun Lee, Jae Lim Chung, Young Jun Kim, Jae Yong Kim, Hungwon Tchah
Summary: The study aimed to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses using standard keratometry and total keratometry, and found that there was no significant difference between the predicted refractive outcomes from the two methods.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
(2021)
Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Emine Dogan, Burcin Cakir, Nilgun Ozkan Aksoy, Gursoy Alagoz
Summary: Surgery for pterygium causes a significant decrease in calculated IOL power obtained with all formulas, with the decrease becoming more pronounced as the size of the pterygium increases.
IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
(2022)
Article
Surgery
Cagri Ilhan, Gozde Aksoy Aydemir, Emre Aydemir
Summary: This study investigates the effects of blepharoplasty on intraocular pressure and ocular biometric parameters. The results show that, in some cases, postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal curvature occur, which require close monitoring and potential adjustment of treatment strategies.
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
(2022)
Article
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Rivkah Lender, Devora Mirsky, Riki Greenberger, Zipora Boim, Lee Ben-Yaakov, Chaya Kashtan, Ibrahim Naffar, Shira Shine, Itay Chowers, Hadas Ben-Eli
Summary: This study evaluated the use of different biometry devices and a corneal topographer in cataract surgery. Strong correlations were found between the devices, but there were differences in some measurements. Additionally, substituting Pentacam K-values resulted in an increase in cylinder power.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
(2022)
Article
Ophthalmology
Romain Touze, Pascal Dureau, Catherine Edelson, Yse Borella, Amandine Barjol, Patrice de Laage de Meux, Georges Caputo
Summary: The final refraction after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is a challenge in pediatric cataract management. This study aimed to validate a method of IOL power calculation by evaluating the final refractive error in all patients with IOL implantation at our institution. The undercorrection formula used for IOL implantation leads to refractive results close to emmetropia in our patients.
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
(2022)
Review
Ophthalmology
Savleen Kaur, Jaspreet Sukhija, Jagat Ram
Summary: The major challenge in pediatric cataract surgery these days is postoperative refractive error, especially amblyopia caused by this error. The role of IOL power calculation formulae in affecting postoperative refractive error is crucial. It remains unclear which age-appropriate formula should be used.
INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
(2021)
Article
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Kenneth J. Hoffer, Irene Abicca, Giacomo Savini
Summary: The study found that the ANTERION device had high repeatability in measurements, with good agreement with MS-39 and IOLMaster for most parameters. Astigmatism repeatability improved with higher degrees of astigmatism.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
(2021)
Review
Ophthalmology
Jinkwon Chung, Jennifer J. Bu, Natalie A. Afshari
Summary: This review focuses on comparing intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and selecting the best performing formulas based on patient factors. The Barrett Universal II formula, Olsen four-factor formula, and Hill-RBF calculator have all shown good prediction results. The Kane formula, incorporating artificial intelligence, has shown the best performance for all axial lengths. Challenging cases still require special consideration.
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
(2022)
Article
Pediatrics
Elena Martinez-Plaza, Ainhoa Molina-Martin, Alfonso Arias-Puente, David P. Pinero
Summary: The study confirmed the consistency of measurements from the Myah device with the Myopia Master system in a pediatric population, indicating the usefulness of these data in clinical practice. The results suggest that these measurements can be used interchangeably with caution.
Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Yi-Ching Chu, Tzu-Lun Huang, Pei-Yao Chang, Wei-Ting Ho, Yung-Ray Hsu, Shu-Wen Chang, Jia-Kang Wang
Summary: The Haigis and Barrett Universal II formulas showed better accuracy in predicting IOL power in extremely long eyes, while the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, and T2 formulas had hyperopic prediction errors. The absolute error tended to be larger in patients with longer axial length.
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
(2022)
Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Hideki Fukumitsu, Vicent J. Camps, Sara Miraflores, David P. Pinero
Summary: This study characterized the variations of clinical effective lens position and intraocular lens position after cataract surgery with single-piece monofocal IOLs, finding that changes in refraction from 1 to 6 months postoperatively are not clinically relevant due to good positional stability. The study also showed a strong correlation between changes in spherical equivalent and clinical ELP over time, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in IOL power calculations.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
(2021)
Article
Ophthalmology
H. Burkhard Dick, Ronald D. Gerste
Summary: The future of intraocular lens (IOL) technology is full of innovations, with a focus on customization, fine-tuning, and correction of presbyopia. New technologies such as extended depth-of-focus IOLs and pinhole IOLs are constantly emerging, representing the future direction of development.
Article
Ophthalmology
Huanhuan Cheng, Li Wang, Jack X. Kane, Jianbing Li, Liangping Liu, Mingxing Wu
Summary: This study compares the accuracy of different artificial intelligence formulas in highly myopic and extremely myopic eyes, with the Kane formula showing superior performance. Additionally, in extremely myopic eyes, the Kane formula outperforms the RBF 2.0, BUII, and Haigis methods.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
(2021)
Article
Ophthalmology
Alberto Dominguez-Vicent, Abinaya Priya Venkataraman, Amanda Dalin, Rune Brautaset, Robert Montes-Mico
Summary: This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and agreement of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) for several biometric parameters. Measurements were conducted on 74 eyes of 74 patients using Eyestar 900 SS-OCT and Lenstar LS 900 OLCR. Repeatability was assessed using intrasubject standard deviation, coefficient of variability (CoV), and coefficient of repeatability (CoR), while agreement between instruments was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.
Article
Ophthalmology
Yiran Wang, Ting Wan, Luze Liu, Yuyuan Xue, Xinyao Chen, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou, Jinjin Yu, Jinhai Huang
Summary: The agreement of measurements between a new OLCR biometer and a SD-OCT/Placido topographer was assessed in healthy subjects. The results showed high agreement between the OLCR biometer and the SD-OCT/Placido topographer for measurements of parameters including CCT, ACD, AQD, Km, and CD.
