Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 449-459
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-02-04
DOI
10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Strengthening the Practice of Exercise and Sport-Science Research
- (2018) Israel Halperin et al. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
- (2018) Hannah Fraser et al. PLoS One
- Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
- (2018) Daniele Fanelli PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The preregistration revolution
- (2018) Brian A. Nosek et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Notice of Retraction: Wansink B, Cheney MM. Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption. JAMA. 2005;293(14):1727-1728.
- (2018) Howard Bauchner JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Making sense of replications
- (2017) Brian A Nosek et al. eLife
- Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
- (2016) Sander Greenland et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value
- (2016) Dorothy V.M. Bishop et al. PeerJ
- True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention
- (2015) Greg Atkinson et al. EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
- Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations
- (2015) Chirag J. Patel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?
- (2015) Padhraig S. Fleming et al. PLoS One
- I Just Ran a Thousand Analyses: Benefits of Multiple Testing in Understanding Equivocal Evidence on Gene-Environment Interactions
- (2015) Vera E. Heininga et al. PLoS One
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- Trap of trends to statistical significance: likelihood of near significant P value becoming more significant with extra data
- (2014) J. Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation
- (2014) Jonathan Kimmelman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Publication of Sports Medicine–Related Randomized Controlled Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2012) Jaskarndip Chahal et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
- (2012) Christopher D. Chambers CORTEX
- Comparison of Arthroplasty Trial Publications After Registration in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2012) Holly N. Smith et al. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- An Applied Research Model for the Sport Sciences
- (2009) David Bishop SPORTS MEDICINE
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
- (2008) John P. A. Ioannidis EPIDEMIOLOGY
- EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research
- (2008) Douglas G Altman et al. LANCET
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started