Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?
Authors
Keywords
Medical journals, Government funding of science, Clinical trials, Corporate funding of science, Health services research, Randomized controlled trials, Publication ethics, Systematic reviews
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages e0127495
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2015-05-22
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0127495
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality
- (2014) Padhraig S. Fleming et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?
- (2014) Despina Koletsi et al. PLoS One
- Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Reports in Surgery Journals
- (2013) Rachel Rosenthal et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions
- (2013) Gerjon Hannink et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals
- (2013) Shane Killeen et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis
- (2013) Malgorzata M. Bala et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- (2013) A.-W. Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
- (2012) Jennifer Marie Tetzlaff et al. Trials
- Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy
- (2011) Mirjana Huić et al. PLoS One
- Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study
- (2009) R. Ewart et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) Sylvain Mathieu JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
- (2009) Joseph S. Ross et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now