A systematic review of the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A systematic review of the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 2307-2322
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-10-30
DOI
10.1002/pon.5262
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The psychological impact of being on a monitoring pathway for localised prostate cancer: a UK‐wide mixed methods study
- (2019) Lauren Matheson et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Investigating the psychological impact of active surveillance or active treatment in newly diagnosed favorable‐risk prostate cancer patients: A 9‐month longitudinal study
- (2019) Eimear Ruane‐McAteer et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Identifying the exercise-based support needs and exercise programme preferences among men with prostate cancer during active surveillance: A qualitative study
- (2019) Megan McIntosh et al. European Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review
- (2018) Netty Kinsella et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Long-term Psychological and Quality-of-life Effects of Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting After Diagnosis of Low-risk Localised Prostate Cancer
- (2018) Sam J. Egger et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Informational needs during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A qualitative study
- (2018) Stacy Loeb et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Reasons for Discontinuing Active Surveillance: Assessment of 21 Centres in 12 Countries in the Movember GAP3 Consortium
- (2018) Mieke Van Hemelrijck et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Appropriateness Criteria for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
- (2017) Michael L. Cher et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation
- (2017) Daniel A. Galvão et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Examining the accessibility of high-quality physical activity behaviour change support freely available online for men with prostate cancer
- (2017) Camille E. Short et al. Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Development of an International Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry
- (2016) Sue M. Evans et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- A retrospective analysis of Victorian and South Australian clinical registries for prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and management of the disease
- (2016) Rasa Ruseckaite et al. BMC CANCER
- A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment
- (2016) Leonard P. Bokhorst et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Enhancing active surveillance of prostate cancer: the potential of exercise medicine
- (2016) Daniel A. Galvão et al. Nature Reviews Urology
- 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2016) Freddie C. Hamdy et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: Is there a greater psychological impact than previously thought? A systematic, mixed studies literature review
- (2016) Eimear Ruane-McAteer et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Wellbeing during Active Surveillance for localised prostate cancer: A systematic review of psychological morbidity and quality of life
- (2015) Gregory Carter et al. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
- Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs
- (2015) A.J.L. King et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
- Identifying the unmet supportive care needs of men living with and beyond prostate cancer: A systematic review
- (2015) Catherine Paterson et al. European Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Determining Change to Radical Treatment in Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2015) Andrew J. Simpkin et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- How Does Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Affect Quality of Life? A Systematic Review
- (2015) Lara Bellardita et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Compliance to exercise-oncology guidelines in prostate cancer survivors and associations with psychological distress, unmet supportive care needs, and quality of life
- (2015) Daniel A. Galvão et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Improving psychosocial health in men with prostate cancer through an intervention that reinforces masculine values - exercise
- (2015) Prue Cormie et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- The importance of dietary change for men diagnosed with and at risk of prostate cancer: a multi-centre interview study with men, their partners and health professionals
- (2014) Kerry NL Avery et al. BMC Family Practice
- Cancer statistics, 2014
- (2014) Rebecca Siegel et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- ‘What is this active surveillance thing?’ Men's and partners' reactions to treatment decision making for prostate cancer when active surveillance is the recommended treatment option
- (2014) Clare O'Callaghan et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Masculinities and patient perspectives of communication about active surveillance for prostate cancer.
- (2013) Lawrence W. Mróz et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- ‘It's not like you just had a heart attack’: decision-making about active surveillance by men with localized prostate cancer
- (2013) Robert J. Volk et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Factors associated with adherence to physical activity guidelines in patients with prostate cancer
- (2013) Kelly Chipperfield et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Patient acceptance of active surveillance as a treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer
- (2011) B. Joyce Davison et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- The needs for men undergoing active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer: results of a focus group study
- (2011) Meredith W Kazer et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
- Factors influencing treatment decision making and information preferences of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance
- (2011) Barbara Joyce Davison et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result
- (2010) R C Macefield et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Hit by Waves-Living With Local Advanced or Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Endocrine Therapy or Under Active Surveillance
- (2010) Bente Ervik et al. CANCER NURSING
- Time Trends and Local Variation in Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2010) Matthew R. Cooperberg et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- “I wish I’d told them”: A qualitative study examining the unmet psychosexual needs of prostate cancer patients during follow-up after treatment
- (2010) Rosaleen O’Brien et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Patients' Supportive Care Needs Beyond the End of Cancer Treatment: A Prospective, Longitudinal Survey
- (2009) Jo Armes et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Brief assessment of adult cancer patients' perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34)
- (2009) Allison Boyes et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Predictors of change in unmet supportive care needs in cancer
- (2009) M. E. McDowell et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review
- (2009) James D. Harrison et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
- (2008) James Thomas et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services
- (2007) Vanessa Beesley et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started