Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 181566
Publisher
The Royal Society
Online
2019-06-12
DOI
10.1098/rsos.181566
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?
- (2018) Luke Holman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Go beyond bias training
- (2018) Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton et al. NATURE
- Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact
- (2017) Peter van den Besselaar et al. PLoS One
- Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased?
- (2016) Elissa Z. Cameron et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Tenure Track Policy Increases Representation of Women in Senior Academic Positions, but Is Insufficient to Achieve Gender Balance
- (2016) Martha M. Bakker et al. PLoS One
- Many paths to parity for women in science
- (2015) D. Burstein et al. SCIENCE
- Give women an even chance
- (2015) M. McNutt SCIENCE
- Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study
- (2015) Peter van den Besselaar et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Community-level impacts of white-tailed deer on understorey plants in North American forests: a meta-analysis
- (2015) Christopher W. Habeck et al. AoB Plants
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity
- (2014) E. S. Darling CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Focusing on publication quality would benefit all researchers
- (2013) Marco Pautasso TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Equal opportunity metrics should benefit all researchers
- (2013) Elissa Z. Cameron et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis
- (2012) Shinichi Nakagawa et al. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY
- The academic jungle: ecosystem modelling reveals why women are driven out of research
- (2012) Katherine R. O’Brien et al. OIKOS
- The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact
- (2012) Jordi Duch et al. PLoS One
- Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students
- (2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia
- (2012) A. K. Shaw et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Academia's obsession with quantity
- (2012) Joern Fischer et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
- (2011) S. J. Ceci et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Citation pattern and lifespan: a comparison of discipline, institution, and individual
- (2011) Jacob B. Slyder et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Work and family conflict in academic science: Patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities
- (2011) Mary Frank Fox et al. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE
- Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis
- (2010) Wolfgang Viechtbauer et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started