Centralized scientific communities are less likely to generate replicable results
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Centralized scientific communities are less likely to generate replicable results
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
eLife
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Online
2019-07-02
DOI
10.7554/elife.43094
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing
- (2017) Daniel Scott Himmelstein et al. eLife
- Making sense of replications
- (2017) Brian A Nosek et al. eLife
- Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains
- (2017) Estelle Dumas-Mallet et al. Royal Society Open Science
- The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: update 2017
- (2016) Allan Peter Davis et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
- (2016) Jay J. Van Bavel et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- What does research reproducibility mean?
- (2016) Steven N. Goodman et al. Science Translational Medicine
- Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
- (2016) Silas Boye Nissen et al. eLife
- The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations
- (2016) Anita Bandrowski et al. PLoS One
- How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop
- (2015) Regina Nuzzo NATURE
- Self-correction in science at work
- (2015) B. Alberts et al. SCIENCE
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery
- (2015) Richard McElreath et al. PLoS One
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
- (2014) Timothy M Errington et al. eLife
- Matthew: Effect or Fable?
- (2013) Pierre Azoulay et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies
- (2013) Benjamin Haibe-Kains et al. NATURE
- Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance
- (2013) Alina Lungeanu et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect
- (2011) J. Lorenz et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Metaknowledge
- (2011) J. A. Evans et al. SCIENCE
- 'Big science' spurs collaborative trend
- (2010) Eric Hand NATURE
- The EigenfactorTM Metrics
- (2008) C. T. Bergstrom et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship
- (2008) J. A. Evans SCIENCE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now