Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools
Authors
Keywords
Software tools, Software development, Computational biology, Bioinformatics, Software design, Altmetrics, Internet, Genome analysis
Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages e3000333
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2019-06-21
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000333
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- How to make replication the norm
- (2018) Paul Gertler et al. NATURE
- Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences
- (2018) Björn Grüning et al. NATURE METHODS
- An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility
- (2018) Victoria Stodden et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Reproducibility of computational workflows is automated using continuous analysis
- (2017) Brett K Beaulieu-Jones et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Use it or lose it: citations predict the continued online availability of published bioinformatics resources
- (2017) Jonathan D. Wren et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- All biology is computational biology
- (2017) Florian Markowetz PLOS BIOLOGY
- Ten Simple Rules for Developing Usable Software in Computational Biology
- (2017) Markus List et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Task allocation and site fidelity jointly influence foraging regulation in honeybee colonies
- (2017) Thiago Mosqueiro et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Bioinformatics programs are 31-fold over-represented among the highest impact scientific papers of the past two decades
- (2016) Jonathan D. Wren BIOINFORMATICS
- Database under maintenance
- (2016) NATURE METHODS
- Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub
- (2016) Yasset Perez-Riverol et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Adapting bioinformatics curricula for big data
- (2015) Anna C. Greene et al. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
- Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical?
- (2015) Zachary D. Stephens et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Comparative assessment of methods for the computational inference of transcript isoform abundance from RNA-seq data
- (2015) Alexander Kanitz et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- The top 100 papers
- (2014) Richard Van Noorden et al. NATURE
- Current Practice in Software Development for Computational Neuroscience and How to Improve It
- (2014) Marc-Oliver Gewaltig et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- A comprehensive evaluation of assembly scaffolding tools
- (2014) Martin Hunt et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data
- (2013) S. Pabinger et al. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
- The big challenges of big data
- (2013) Vivien Marx NATURE
- The anatomy of successful computational biology software
- (2013) Stephen Altschul et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Tools for mapping high-throughput sequencing data
- (2012) Nuno A. Fonseca et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- A call for bioimaging software usability
- (2012) Anne E Carpenter et al. NATURE METHODS
- Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software
- (2012) Andreas Prlić et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- URL decay in MEDLINE--a 4-year follow-up study
- (2008) J. D. Wren BIOINFORMATICS
- An update on Uniform Resource Locator (URL) decay in MEDLINE abstracts and measures for its mitigation
- (2008) Erick Ducut et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started