An Examination of Gender Differences in the American Fisheries Society Peer-Review Process

Scientific peer review

(2013) Lutz Bornmann   ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Evaluate gender equality in journals

(2013) Shirin Heidari et al.   NATURE

Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap

(2013) Helen Shen   NATURE

Diversity in Natural Resource Science Professions

(2012) Christine M. Moffitt   FISHERIES

The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact

(2012) Jordi Duch et al.   PLoS One

Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention in Science and Engineering by Gender

(2012) D. Kaminski et al.   SCIENCE

Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

(2011) S. J. Ceci et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Exploring the Peer Review Process: What is it, Does it Work, and Can it Be Improved?

(2010) Dennis R. De Vries et al.   FISHERIES

Differences in Editorial Board Reviewer Behavior Based on Gender

(2010) Deborah A. Wing et al.   JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH

Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation

(2009) Richard B. Primack et al.   BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION

To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review

(2009) Robyn M. Borsuk et al.   BIOSCIENCE

Double-blind peer review and gender publication bias

(2008) Leif Engqvist et al.   ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

(2007) A BUDDEN et al.   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION