标题
Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages e1001563
出版商
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
发表日期
2013-12-04
DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe
- (2013) S Godecharle et al. LANCET
- Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting
- (2013) Daniele Fanelli NATURE
- Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
- (2013) R. Grant Steen et al. PLoS One
- US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- (2013) D. Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Shaking Up Science
- (2013) J. Couzin-Frankel SCIENCE
- Global Research Integrity Training
- (2013) N. H. Steneck SCIENCE
- Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
- (2013) A. Kaatz et al. mBio
- Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- (2013) Joseph Ana et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- (2012) David B Resnik et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey
- (2012) Hendrik P. van Dalen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature
- (2012) Michael L. Grieneisen et al. PLoS One
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
- (2012) F. C. Fang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008
- (2011) E. Wager et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Changing Incentives to Publish
- (2011) C. Franzoni et al. SCIENCE
- Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study
- (2011) Peter Williams et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems
- (2011) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Deja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature
- (2008) M. Errami et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Letter to the Editor: Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources
- (2008) MARCUS R. MUNAFÒ et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now