Predicting Harms and Benefits in Translational Trials: Ethics, Evidence, and Uncertainty
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Predicting Harms and Benefits in Translational Trials: Ethics, Evidence, and Uncertainty
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages e1001010
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2011-03-09
DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001010
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- What Can Be Inferred from the Interruption of the Semagacestat Trial for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease?
- (2010) Jeffrey Cummings BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
- Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study
- (2010) Michael Gold et al. DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
- Stem cells in human neurodegenerative disorders — time for clinical translation?
- (2010) Olle Lindvall et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Alzheimer's disease: clinical trials and drug development
- (2010) Francesca Mangialasche et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Gene delivery of AAV2-neurturin for Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial
- (2010) William J Marks et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Alzheimer's failure raises questions about disease-modifying strategies
- (2010) Andy Extance NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: LEADe
- (2010) H. H. Feldman et al. NEUROLOGY
- Beyond Access vs. Protection in Trials of Innovative Therapies
- (2010) A. J. London et al. SCIENCE
- Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy
- (2010) Emily S. Sena et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
- (2010) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?
- (2010) H. Bart van der Worp et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Effects of NXY-059 in experimental stroke: an individual animal meta-analysis
- (2009) PMW Bath et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
- Development of semagacestat (LY450139), a functional γ-secretase inhibitor, for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease
- (2009) David B Henley et al. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
- Effect of Tarenflurbil on Cognitive Decline and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Mild Alzheimer DiseaseA Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2009) Robert C. Green JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Launching invasive, first-in-human trials against Parkinson's disease: Ethical considerations
- (2009) Jonathan Kimmelman et al. MOVEMENT DISORDERS
- The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009)
- (2009) C. W. Olanow et al. NEUROLOGY
- A phase 2 multiple ascending dose trial of bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease
- (2009) S. Salloway et al. NEUROLOGY
- Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals
- (2009) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLoS One
- Fetal Cells Again?
- (2009) C. Holden SCIENCE
- Treatment Success in CancerNew Cancer Treatment Successes Identified in Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted by the National Cancer Institute–Sponsored Cooperative Oncology Groups, 1955 to 2006
- (2008) Benjamin Djulbegovic ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A Call for Physiopathological Ethics
- (2008) Pedro R Lowenstein MOLECULAR THERAPY
- Good Laboratory Practice
- (2008) Malcolm R. Macleod et al. STROKE
- Methodological Quality of Animal Studies of Neuroprotective Agents Currently in Phase II/III Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials
- (2008) Maria Philip et al. STROKE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started