Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Scientific Reports
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-08-02
DOI
10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- How do regulatory networks evolve and expand throughout evolution?
- (2015) Karin Voordeckers et al. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
- eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences
- (2015) Jaime Huerta-Cepas et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- NCG 5.0: updates of a manually curated repository of cancer genes and associated properties from cancer mutational screenings
- (2015) Omer An et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity
- (2014) Matthew T. Weirauch et al. CELL
- How duplicated transcription regulators can diversify to govern the expression of nonoverlapping sets of genes
- (2014) J. C. Perez et al. GENES & DEVELOPMENT
- Jaccard index based similarity measure to compare transcription factor binding site models
- (2013) Ilya E Vorontsov et al. Algorithms for Molecular Biology
- DNA-Binding Specificities of Human Transcription Factors
- (2013) Arttu Jolma et al. CELL
- JASPAR 2014: an extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
- (2013) Anthony Mathelier et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- DNA-binding specificity changes in the evolution of forkhead transcription factors
- (2013) S. Nakagawa et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Following Gene Duplication, Paralog Interference Constrains Transcriptional Circuit Evolution
- (2013) Christopher R. Baker et al. SCIENCE
- The role of Transposable Elements in shaping the combinatorial interaction of Transcription Factors
- (2012) Alessandro Testori et al. BMC GENOMICS
- PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees
- (2012) Huaiyu Mi et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Modification of Gene Duplicability during the Evolution of Protein Interaction Network
- (2011) Matteo D'Antonio et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Lineage-specific transcription factors and the evolution of gene regulatory networks
- (2010) K. Nowick et al. Briefings in Functional Genomics
- Multiplexed massively parallel SELEX for characterization of human transcription factor binding specificities
- (2010) A. Jolma et al. GENOME RESEARCH
- The life and death of gene families
- (2009) Jeffery P. Demuth et al. BIOESSAYS
- Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data
- (2009) Aaron Clauset et al. SIAM REVIEW
- Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs
- (2009) Zeba Wunderlich et al. TRENDS IN GENETICS
- Adaptive Evolution in Zinc Finger Transcription Factors
- (2009) Ryan O. Emerson et al. PLoS Genetics
- Analysis of the platypus genome suggests a transposon origin for mammalian imprinting
- (2009) Andrew J Pask et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- Patterns of evolutionary constraints on genes in humans
- (2008) Subhajyoti De et al. BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
- Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution
- (2008) Sean B. Carroll CELL
- Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
- (2008) Gavin C. Conant et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Evolution of Evolvability in Gene Regulatory Networks
- (2008) Anton Crombach et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Functional protein divergence in the evolution of Homo sapiens
- (2008) Nuria Lopez-Bigas et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started