Consensus Forecasting of Species Distributions: The Effects of Niche Model Performance and Niche Properties
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Consensus Forecasting of Species Distributions: The Effects of Niche Model Performance and Niche Properties
Authors
Keywords
Ecological niches, Forecasting, Climate change, Principal component analysis, Trees, China, Geographic distribution, Statistical distributions
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages e0120056
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2015-03-19
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0120056
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Illuminating geographical patterns in species' range shifts
- (2014) Gaël Grenouillet et al. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
- Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks
- (2013) Laura Meller et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Evaluating ensemble forecasts of plant species distributions under climate change
- (2013) Shawn M. Crimmins et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data
- (2013) Canran Liu et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Challenges in predicting the future distributions of invasive plant species
- (2012) Chad C. Jones FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
- Small range size and narrow niche breadth predict range contractions in South African frogs
- (2012) Emily A. Botts et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Modelling the spread ofFagus sylvaticaandPicea abiesin southern Scandinavia during the late Holocene
- (2012) Ronald Bialozyt et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Using virtual species to study species distributions and model performance
- (2012) Christine N. Meynard et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Correlation and process in species distribution models: bridging a dichotomy
- (2012) Carsten F. Dormann et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
- (2012) Morgane Barbet-Massin et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates
- (2011) Raquel A. Garcia et al. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
- Predicting range shifts of northern bird species: Influence of modelling technique and topography
- (2010) Raimo Virkkala et al. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
- Ensemble modelling of species distribution: the effects of geographical and environmental ranges
- (2010) Gael Grenouillet et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change
- (2009) José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Differences in spatial predictions among species distribution modeling methods vary with species traits and environmental predictors
- (2009) Alexandra D. Syphard et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Comparing niche- and process-based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change
- (2009) Xavier Morin et al. ECOLOGY
- Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution
- (2009) LAËTITIA BUISSON et al. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
- Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
- (2008) M. S. Wisz et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling
- (2008) Mathieu Marmion et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance
- (2007) Rosa M. Chefaoui et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios
- (2007) Louis R. Iverson et al. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started