What Guidance Are Researchers Given on How to Present Network Meta-Analyses to End-Users such as Policymakers and Clinicians? A Systematic Review
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What Guidance Are Researchers Given on How to Present Network Meta-Analyses to End-Users such as Policymakers and Clinicians? A Systematic Review
Authors
Keywords
Network analysis, Treatment guidelines, Meta-analysis, Systematic reviews, Research reporting guidelines, Health care policy, Database searching, Health care policy reports
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages e113277
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-12-18
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0113277
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Novel presentational approaches were developed for reporting network meta-analysis
- (2014) Sze Huey Tan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement
- (2014) Brian Hutton et al. PLoS One
- Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks
- (2014) Adriani Nikolakopoulou et al. PLoS One
- Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Georgia Salanti et al. PLoS One
- Indirect Treatment Comparison/Network Meta-Analysis Study Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
- (2014) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Exploring the Geometry of Treatment Networks
- (2013) Georgia Salanti et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis
- (2013) Andrea Cipriani et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions
- (2013) A. A. Veroniki et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
- (2013) Anna Chaimani et al. PLoS One
- Faulty Connections: Can Criticisms of Network Meta-Analysis in Nice Submissions Be Avoided?
- (2013) A. Martin et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods
- (2013) Sarah Donegan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- How to Use an Article Reporting a Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis
- (2012) Edward J. Mills et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
- (2012) Georgia Salanti Research Synthesis Methods
- “Might” or “suggest”? No wording approach was clearly superior in conveying the strength of recommendation
- (2011) Elie A. Akl et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Maximizing the Impact of Systematic Reviews in Health Care Decision Making: A Systematic Scoping Review of Knowledge-Translation Resources
- (2011) DUNCAN CHAMBERS et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2
- (2011) David C. Hoaglin et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
- (2011) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane review authors
- (2011) Asmaa S. Abdelhamid et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
- (2010) Melissa C. Brouwers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
- (2010) Sarah Donegan et al. PLoS One
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now