- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages e99682
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-07-04
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0099682
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Novel presentational approaches were developed for reporting network meta-analysis
- (2014) Sze Huey Tan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis
- (2013) Andrea Cipriani et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
- (2013) Ulrike Krahn et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers
- (2013) Jeroen P Jansen et al. BMC Medicine
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4
- (2013) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
- (2013) Anna Chaimani et al. PLoS One
- Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
- (2012) Fujian Song et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers
- (2012) J. C. Dumville et al. DIABETOLOGIA
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- (2012) Rebecca M Turner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
- (2012) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes
- (2012) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
- (2012) J. P. T. Higgins et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
- (2012) Georgia Salanti Research Synthesis Methods
- Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions
- (2012) Anna Chaimani et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed
- (2011) Tianjing Li et al. BMC Medicine
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
- (2010) Georgia Salanti et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
- (2010) S. Dias et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered
- (2009) Georgia Salanti et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry
- (2008) Jaime L. Peters et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
- (2008) Julian P. T. Higgins et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions
- (2007) F. Song et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search