Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages e86754
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-01-23
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0086754
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009
- (2014) Andrew W. Lee JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions
- (2013) A. A. Veroniki et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4
- (2013) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review
- (2013) Diana M Sobieraj et al. BMJ Open
- Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
- (2013) A. Bafeta et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
- (2012) Fujian Song et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- (2012) Rebecca M Turner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
- (2012) J. P. T. Higgins et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression
- (2012) Ian R. White et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Estimating the Power of Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study
- (2011) Edward J. Mills et al. PLoS One
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
- (2011) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency
- (2010) Deborah M. Caldwell et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
- (2010) Sarah Donegan et al. PLoS One
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
- (2010) S. Dias et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
- (2009) S. J. Edwards et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Incorporating multiple interventions in meta-analysis: an evaluation of the mixed treatment comparison with the adjusted indirect comparison
- (2009) Christopher O'Regan et al. Trials
- Direct versus indirect comparisons: A summary of the evidence
- (2008) Gerald Gartlehner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started