How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 96-107
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2012-12-07
DOI
10.1002/asi.22765
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Scientific peer review
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)
- (2012) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers
- (2012) Loet Leydesdorff SCIENTOMETRICS
- Finding the Easter eggs hidden by oneself: Why Radicchi and Castellano's (2012) fairness test for citation indicators is not fair
- (2012) Daniel Sirtes Journal of Informetrics
- Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator
- (2011) Ronald Rousseau JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Universality of citation distributions revisited
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking
- (2011) Wolfgang Glänzel et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?
- (2011) Jerome K. Vanclay SCIENTOMETRICS
- Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing
- (2011) Ping Zhou et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts
- (2011) Filippo Radicchi et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management
- (2010) Ismael Rafols et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. Journal of Informetrics
- On reliability and robustness of scientometrics indicators based on stochastic models. An evidence-based opinion paper
- (2010) Wolfgang Glänzel Journal of Informetrics
- Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
- (2010) Henk F. Moed Journal of Informetrics
- There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization
- (2010) Yves Gingras et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects
- (2009) Ismael Rafols et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?
- (2009) Loet Leydesdorff JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor
- (2008) Michel Zitt et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Differences in impact factor across fields and over time
- (2008) Benjamin M. Althouse et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
- (2008) F. Radicchi et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started