Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 11, Pages 2133-2146
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2011-08-08
DOI
10.1002/asi.21609
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff
- (2010) Anthony F.J. van Raan et al. Journal of Informetrics
- On reliability and robustness of scientometrics indicators based on stochastic models. An evidence-based opinion paper
- (2010) Wolfgang Glänzel Journal of Informetrics
- Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics
- Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance
- (2010) Tobias Opthof et al. Journal of Informetrics
- There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization
- (2010) Yves Gingras et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects
- (2009) Ismael Rafols et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?
- (2009) Loet Leydesdorff JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications
- (2009) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma
- (2008) Roger A. Brumback JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY
- Response to Correspondence, “`Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma': Correcting the Record”
- (2008) Roger A. Brumback JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY
- “Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma”: Correcting the Record
- (2008) James Pringle JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY
- Irreproducible Results—a Response to Thomson Scientific
- (2008) Mike Rossner et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
- Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis
- (2008) Dangzhi Zhao et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started