Journal Title
Applied Physics Reviews

APPL PHYS REV

ISSN / eISSN
1931-9401 / 1931-9401
Aims and Scope
Applied Physics Reviews (APR) features articles on important and current topics in experimental or theoretical research in applied physics or applications of physics to other branches of science and engineering. APR publishes the following types of articles:

-Original Research: An article reporting on an important and novel research study of high quality and general interest to the applied physics community.
-Reviews: This type of article can either be an authoritative, comprehensive review of established areas of applied physics, or a short timely review of recent advances in established fields or new and emerging areas of applied physics.
The majority of Review articles in APR are by invitation. Authors who wish to submit a Review article without invitation must provide the following:

-a solid case for why their Review is timely and of interest to the readership of APR,
-substantial evidence that they are recognized as top experts in the field and that they are highly qualified to write such a Review, and
-an editorial summary with their article for consideration by the editors.
Subject Area

PHYSICS, APPLIED

CiteScore
23.80 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Physics and Astronomy - General Physics and Astronomy Q1 #10/240
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
PHYSICS, APPLIED - SCIE Q1
H-index
40
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
AIP Publishing LLC
Annual Article Volume
130
Open Access
NO
Contact
1305 WALT WHITMAN RD, STE 300, MELVILLE, USA, NY, 11747-4501
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
I received an invitation to submit a review article from the APR editor because of other research articles I had already published. At that time, I happened to be writing a review article, so I asked the editor if it would be acceptable. They said it was, but they mentioned that the scope of my original content was too small and asked me to expand it and write a longer article. They gave me a deadline of six months. Following the editor's advice, I completed the writing and submitted it. The editor and two reviewers provided feedback, and while there were no major issues, one of the reviewers pointed out twice that the direction of my review did not align with the scope of the APR journal. After my first explanation was ineffective, I responded and made revisions, which were then accepted. It seems that the editor held more authority in this decision. Despite some difficulties, the overall process went smoothly, and communication with the editor was very smooth and efficient, leaving me with a positive impression.
2021-10-12
9.9.22 submit
09.17.22 securing reviewer
09.20.22 under review
09.25.22 securing reviewer
09.27.22 under review
10.11.22 editorial evaluation-editor
10.11.22 Decision Letter being Prepared
中修,两个reviewer, 一个建议投chemistry相关的刊+提了4个意见,另一个reviewer很positive 提了5个意见
11.19.22 resubmit
12.19.22 decision letter- accepted

Translation:
9.9.22 submit
09.17.22 securing reviewer
09.20.22 under review
09.25.22 securing reviewer
09.27.22 under review
10.11.22 editorial evaluation-editor
10.11.22 Decision Letter being Prepared
During revision, two reviewers, one suggested submission to a chemistry-related journal and provided 4 comments, while the other reviewer was very positive and provided 5 comments.
11.19.22 resubmit
12.19.22 decision letter- accepted
2023-01-01

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started