Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Journal Title
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

J ADV MODEL EARTH SY

ISSN / eISSN
1942-2466
Aims and Scope
The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community.

Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download.
Formal peer review.
Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge.
No additional charge for color figures.
Modest page charges to cover production costs.
Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML.
Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
Subject Area

METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES

CiteScore
12.80 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Earth and Planetary Sciences - General Earth and Planetary Sciences Q1 #6/192
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Global and Planetary Change Q1 #7/113
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Environmental Chemistry Q1 #17/139
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES - SCIE Q1
H-index
38
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Annual Article Volume
249
Open Access
YES
Contact
2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20009
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
2022-04-21 Submission
2022-08-08 major revision
2022-10-15 Revision Received
2023-02-15 minor revision
2023-03-07 Revision Received
2023-05-19 Accepted

To be honest, the review process is a bit slow. The first review took three months, the second review took four months, and the crucial part is that after the minor revision in the second review, there was another round of submission, which took another two months. The review process is very strict, and it feels like a complete overhaul with each round of revisions. The journal is a very good one, with a high impact factor. However, the Chinese Academy of Sciences' classification system is messed up - not only is it not classified as a top-tier journal, it's not even in the first tier. JAMES remains a leader in the field of Earth science modeling, along with the GMD journal, enjoying a high reputation internationally, but unfortunately being overlooked and trampled upon domestically. Hopefully, the domestic evaluation system will not be too utilitarian and will pay more attention to basic research, providing fair evaluations.
2023-06-04

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now