Journal Title
WIRELESS NETWORKS

WIREL NETW

ISSN / eISSN
1022-0038 / 1572-8196
Aims and Scope
The wireless communication revolution is bringing fundamental changes to data networking, telecommunication, and is making integrated networks a reality. By freeing the user from the cord, personal communications networks, wireless LAN's, mobile radio networks and cellular systems, harbor the promise of fully distributed mobile computing and communications, any time, anywhere.

Focusing on the networking and user aspects of the field, Wireless Networks provides a global forum for archival value contributions documenting these fast growing areas of interest. The journal publishes refereed articles dealing with research, experience and management issues of wireless networks. Its aim is to allow the reader to benefit from experience, problems and solutions described.
Subject Area

COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS

ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

CiteScore
6.70 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Engineering - Electrical and Electronic Engineering Q1 #154/738
Engineering - Computer Networks and Communications Q1 #88/379
Engineering - Information Systems Q1 #90/379
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS - SCIE Q3
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE Q2
TELECOMMUNICATIONS - SCIE Q3
H-index
82
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Springer US
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Year Publication Started
1995
Annual Article Volume
373
Open Access
NO
Contact
SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Processing begins three months after submission, and two months later it is rejected. The reviewers are highly unprofessional; none of the five reviewers actually took the time to carefully read my work or understand what I have done. I conducted a confidentiality performance analysis, and yet two of the reviewers actually requested that I provide a confidentiality plan. The rest of the feedback was mostly clichés and lacked any valuable suggestions. This is not the first time I have been rejected, and I am aware that my level is not high, but the reviewers' comments are truly absurd.
2021-06-10
In September, the feedback suggested major revisions. Due to a busy schedule and delays caused by other papers, it took over 3 months to make the necessary changes, and the revised version was submitted in December. On February 3rd, the feedback for the second review was received, and the experts indicated that it could be accepted. Currently, the communication author is being modified, and the application form has just been filled out. It is estimated that there will be some more hassle involved.
2022-02-07

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started