PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE

Journal Title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE

P I MECH ENG C-J MEC

ISSN / eISSN
0954-4062 / 2041-2983
Aims and Scope
The Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science advances the understanding of both the fundamentals of engineering science and its application to the solution of challenges and problems in engineering.
Subject Area

ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL

CiteScore
3.50 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Q2 #255/631
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL - SCIE Q3
H-index
51
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
SAGE Publications Ltd
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Annual Article Volume
712
Open Access
NO
Contact
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING PUBLISHING LTD, 1 BIRDCAGE WALK, WESTMINISTER, ENGLAND, SW1H 9JJ
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Last year in July, I submitted my manuscript. In November, there were minor revisions from two reviewers, Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2. The revisions were just minor details. After making the revisions, I resubmitted the manuscript and waited until yesterday. However, a new reviewer, Reviewer 3, raised a bunch of content-related issues (all nitpicking on minor details, why don't you compare yourself with Nature??? Don't you have any standards for your own journal???). Reviewer 1 didn't even review the manuscript (their comments were the same as the initial review), and Reviewer 2 disappeared without a trace. The manuscript was rejected!!!! This journal, NT, accepted the revisions based on the initial review but suddenly this new Reviewer 3 appeared and rejected it. Why didn't they show up during the initial review? This shabby journal will never receive my submission again, and I will make sure more people know about this scandal!!! I also sent an appeal letter!!! There's a high chance it won't work out, so good luck to you all!!!
2023-01-03
Appeal letter written in the past and still no response!!! It's really frustrating. After revising the manuscript, it was rejected because the reviewer had a strange attitude after changing to a new one. One of the two reviewers from the initial review disappeared, and the other didn't say anything. The third person who came in made all sorts of strange comments. You should understand that in the past, all six of my SCI submissions were accepted after making revisions according to the opinions of all the reviewers. I suspect this biased reviewer had personal issues and took it out on my article, it's simply a conspiracy!!! I'm truly angry, resentful, and hurt. You've wasted more than half a year of my time. If you enjoy playing with authors like this, you better shut down soon. You claim to be a prestigious journal, yet you act like this? It would have been better if you had rejected my submission outright from the beginning!!! This journal is truly a disgrace to its reputation!!! Your reasons for rejection are baseless!!!!
2023-01-03

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now