Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine

Journal website Submission website
Ask Question
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal Search
  4. Journal Details
Journal Title
Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine

NANOMED-NANOTECHNOL

ISSN / eISSN
1549-9634 / 1549-9642
Aims and Scope
The mission of Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine (Nanomedicine: NBM) is to promote the emerging interdisciplinary field of nanomedicine.

Nanomedicine: NBM is an international, peer-reviewed journal presenting novel, significant, and interdisciplinary theoretical and experimental results related to nanoscience and nanotechnology in the life and health sciences. Content includes basic, translational, and clinical research addressing diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, prediction, and prevention of diseases.
Subject Area

MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY

CiteScore
11.90 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Pharmaceutical Science Q1 #10/171
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Medicine (miscellaneous) Q1 #20/309
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Biomedical Engineering Q1 #24/277
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Molecular Medicine Q1 #21/171
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - General Materials Science Q1 #56/453
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Bioengineering Q1 #20/153
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL - SCIE Q2
NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY - SCIE Q2
H-index
106
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
2005
Annual Article Volume
157
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Submitted at the end of September, it took a month and a half to wait for two reviewers willing to review. The received feedback seemed like an automated email, with mainly official statements at the beginning, stating that they couldn't accept the current version. However, if the revised version based on the reviewers' comments is submitted again, they would reconsider acceptance. The email also included minor suggestions from the two reviewers. No additional experiments were requested. After two weeks of revision, it was resubmitted and accepted the next morning.
2022-12-23
Received the review results four months after submission. The first time it was sent back for revisions, it took a month for the editor to put it "under review." It took them three weeks to notify me of the completed required review. Now, it has been a month since the second revision was submitted, and it is still "with editor." I sent an email to urge them, and received a sincere reply from someone. However, a week has passed and it is still "with editor." The entire process has already been eight months, and I still can't see any hope of acceptance.
2023-02-23
View All Reviews

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started
Webinars Posters Questions Hubs Funding Journals Articles Connect Collections Reviewers About Us FAQs Mobile App Privacy Policy Terms of Use
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.