Cell Reports Physical Science

Journal Title
Cell Reports Physical Science

ISSN / eISSN
2666-3864 / 2666-3864
Subject Area

CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

CiteScore
7.60 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Engineering - General Engineering Q1 #31/302
Engineering - General Physics and Astronomy Q1 #33/240
Engineering - General Chemistry Q1 #73/407
Engineering - General Energy Q1 #15/71
Engineering - General Materials Science Q1 #95/453
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
ENERGY & FUELS - SCIE Q1
MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
Country/Area of Publication
United States
Publisher
Elsevier
Annual Article Volume
423
Open Access
YES
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
I have a relatively positive view of this journal and have high hopes for its impact factor to exceed 10. However, my personal experience with submitting a manuscript was not good. I received the decision of the second round of review on the same day, which caused me to explode emotionally, so I came here to vent. Afterwards, I realized that there would definitely be people who would criticize me, and accidentally seeing their comments inevitably affected my mood, but I couldn't find a way to delete the comments.

Regarding my submission, I initially submitted to Joule and went through two revisions before it was rejected. The editor of Cell Reports Physical Science sent me an email invitation to transfer my submission, expressing interest in the content of my paper and promising it would be 100% free. They also mentioned that the paper could be pre-accepted or at most sent back to one reviewer for a second review. However, the paper was directly sent back to the original three reviewers. After waiting for two months, the paper was accepted by the other reviewers, but one reviewer still had concerns and the editor rejected it directly.

Perhaps many people would think this is normal. I now realize that I was quite out of control at the time and felt pigeonholed. I couldn't help but react in the moment. I still need to continue cultivating my own mentality.
2022-08-16
投Matter被拒,建议转投CRPS
Rejected by Matter, it is suggested to submit to CRPS.

8.16 Transferred for submission.
9.21 Returned for major revisions, with four reviewers, three provided more positive feedback, and one had more negative feedback.
10.13 Revised and returned, with one round of re-review, during which the status alternated between "under review" and "reviewers complete."
11.9 Received feedback (pre-acceptance), the fourth reviewer rejected it, while the first three agreed to accept it. After considering the editor's opinion, it was given a pre-acceptance, but the issues raised by the fourth reviewer still need to be addressed. After formatting, it was returned on 11.17.
11.23 Accepted.
2022-11-23

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now