Journal of Energy Storage

Jul 6 submitted
Jul 17 with Editor
Aug 5 Under Review
Aug 28 Required review completed
Sep 9.2 Major Revision (one month to return)

Currently, I am in the process of making revisions. I have given the manuscript to three reviewers, all of whom have provided positive feedback and indicated that it can be published with major revisions. The first reviewer raised 19 questions, the second reviewer also raised 19 questions, and the third reviewer raised 2 questions. Overall, both the reviewers and the editor have shown great responsibility, carefully examining the article. They have even read my previously published articles on battery modeling and raised relevant questions. I am amazed and truly grateful for their meticulous reviewing attitude. Regardless of whether this article is ultimately accepted, it will have a significant impact on my research.

Currently, I believe that the reviewing speed of JES (Journal of Energy Storage) still needs improvement. Perhaps it is due to the increase in the impact factor and the number of submissions. My manuscript number is close to 2000! I hope that this journal will continue to improve and I hope that my article will be accepted.

22.6.29 submitted
22.7.04 under review, no reviewers available during this period
22.9.19 author query, editor urged for reviewers and two were quickly assigned
22.11.01 major revision, one major and one minor issue, major revisions were difficult and requested additional case studies (3 weeks)
22.11.18 revision due date extension, due to tight experimental schedule and dormitory quarantine, requested a 2-week extension
22.12.1 submit the revised manuscript
22.12.6 under review
22.12.7 reviews completed (can be viewed in the track link), both reviewers completed the reviews overnight, estimated to be good news
22.12.10 decision in the afternoon
22.12.10 9:00 PM acceptance

Overall, for my first SCI journal publication, I found the Elsevier system and editor to be very nice. The track link received positive feedback and was user-friendly. Although reviewers were not found in the first two months, they were promptly assigned after requesting. The reviewers' comments were insightful and significantly improved the quality of the paper. Additionally, the reviewers were very fast in their responses. Many thanks to the two reviewers!