zhendeman 2023-08-09

6/5 submit to journal
6/7 with editor
7/12 under review
7/22 under review with three reviewers accepted.

求求了给我录用吧 2023-08-07

It takes approximately three weeks from submission to being invited for review, and the initial review process takes about half a year. The journal is of good quality, and the editors are responsible. However, the review speed is indeed not fast.

menghuandeluren 2023-08-01

7/26 submit to journal - This means that on July 26th, a submission needs to be made to a specific journal.
7/27 with editor - This means that on July 27th, there will be communication or interaction with the editor, likely discussing the submitted work or any necessary revisions.

Chen xingguang 2023-08-01

August 1st, it's still under review. Urging twice was useless. It's really rubbish, everyone should not submit. If I graduate this year, I would have already sent it.

LISA-田 2023-07-31

Jul. 30 is still with editor.

LISA-田 2023-07-28

July 9th submission, still with editor today.

phd RS 2023-07-23

Why am I still "With editor" after more than ten days?

废物1 2023-07-22

The translation of the text into English is:

"The speed is very fast. From submission to major repairs to hiring, it took only two months to complete. It's impressive."

zhendeman 2023-07-21

Are you still with the editor? How long has it been?

科研小睿 2023-07-18

Finally hired, the employment notice issued on June 11th has been retrieved now.

小羊加油@ 2023-07-18

It took 7 months to end.

Chen xingguang 2023-07-13

2023/7/13 is still under review, I'm really fed up. The status hasn't changed at all for four months since the second review.

wxyxw 2023-07-11

23.5.9 Major revision (two reviewers, one neutral and one positive, with 14 comments)
23.5.30 First revision submitted
23.7.10 Accepted
For the second revision, there were two reviewers. One reviewer finished the review in a day, while the other reviewer who accepted on June 9th took a long time to complete the review. There was only one comment for the second revision, which the editor accepted directly. Finally, the first SCI paper was completed. Overall, the editor was very responsible. Despite the limited number of reviewers, new reviewers were invited every week, and decisions could be made quickly. It was excellent.

zhang endi 2023-07-03

I don't have a template, and this is also my first time submitting to this journal. Initially, I submitted to "Energy and Buildings," but the editor suggested that I switch to this journal. So, I followed the format and everything based on "Energy and Buildings."

图图是超人 2023-07-03

Hello, may I ask if you have a template for submission? I noticed on their official website that the Word document for general manuscripts requires single-column format. Does this have a significant impact?

XingMing 2023-07-02

Normally, there is no need for a layout fee. However, if you choose to go open source, then it will be required.

yehongchun 2023-07-02

Excuse me, how long have you been with the editor?

六子 2023-07-02

The reviewer requested to cite some documents, but those documents were completely deleted by the editor. I only saw in that comment, "References have been deleted by the editor." What should I do about this?

洁妹妹 2023-07-01

Do I need to pay a layout fee after receiving it?

Echo Zhang 2023-06-29

Hello, may I ask where can I see if the reviewer has provided any comments?

lizeyang 2023-06-29

First review: Major revision (a total of 21 comments)
Second review: Major revision (a total of 5 comments)
Third review: Minor revision (a total of 5 comments)
Continued external review (indicating that 2+ reviewers have accepted the review, and one reviewer has already submitted review comments)

lizeyang 2023-06-29

The journal is so slow! It's really torturous!
Submitted to journal on December 26, 2022.
Under review on December 29, 2022.
Major revision on March 02, 2023.
Under review on March 15, 2023.
Major revision on April 28, 2023.
Under review on May 7, 2023.
Minor revision on May 20, 2023.
Under review on May 31, 2023.
Required reviews completed on June 27, 2023.
Under review on June 28, 2023.

Chen xingguang 2023-06-21

The second trial has been going on for 4 months... It was reminded once on May 26th.

三层吉士堡 2023-06-20

The corresponding author's email has a track link that can be viewed.

赶紧发论文啦啦~ 2023-06-16

May I ask where can I see the comments from the reviewer if they have come back or not?

青蔷薇23 2023-06-16

Does "under review" followed by a direct decision mean rejection?

夜未阑 2023-06-13

6.12 reject (out of scope)

The topic does not match, as it is indeed focused on the electrical power system, but the equipment object includes batteries, which does not align well with the journal's theme. However, personally, I feel that the journal provides results very quickly, within half a month, which does not delay much time. I hope this provides some reference for everyone.

科研小睿 2023-06-11

6.10 Acceptance. From September last year until now, after more than nine months, my first SCI paper in life has finally been accepted. Although it took a long time, the result is ultimately satisfactory. I am looking forward to a better future development.

乐悠刘0320 2023-06-10

2022.12.24 submit - Submitted on December 24, 2022.
2023.2.26 under review - Under review as of February 26, 2023.
2023.3.10 两个审稿人accept，其中一个完成并返回意见 - Accepted by two reviewers on March 10, 2023, one of them completed and returned their comments.
2023.6.10 另外一个审稿人仍未返回 - The other reviewer has not yet returned their comments as of June 10, 2023.
2023.6.11 意见返回 小修 - Comments returned on June 11, 2023, minor revisions required.

蓝蓝蓝洛 2023-06-04

I can't remember the specific details, but there were at least fifty questions in total.