The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
出版年份 2017 全文链接
标题
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PeerJ
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages e3544
出版商
PeerJ
发表日期
2017-07-07
DOI
10.7717/peerj.3544
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- (2017) Daniele Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Making sense of replications
- (2017) Brian A Nosek et al. eLife
- Is Most Published Research Really False?
- (2017) Jeffrey T. Leek et al. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
- The ASA's Statement onp-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- (2016) Ronald L. Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Most of the time, P is an unreliable marker, so we need no exact cut-off
- (2016) G.B. Drummond BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- Underappreciated problems of low replication in ecological field studies
- (2016) Nathan P. Lemoine et al. ECOLOGY
- Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
- (2016) Sander Greenland et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evolution of ReportingPValues in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
- (2016) David Chavalarias et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
- (2016) M.J. Bayarri et al. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Blinding Us to the Obvious? The Effect of Statistical Training on the Evaluation of Evidence
- (2016) Blakeley B. McShane et al. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Confidence intervals are no salvation from the alleged fickleness of the P value
- (2016) Jacques van Helden NATURE METHODS
- What does research reproducibility mean?
- (2016) Steven N. Goodman et al. Science Translational Medicine
- Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions
- (2016) Timothy H. Parker et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions
- (2016) Andrew D. Higginson et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value
- (2016) Dorothy V.M. Bishop et al. PeerJ
- The natural selection of bad science
- (2016) Paul E. Smaldino et al. Royal Society Open Science
- How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop
- (2015) Regina Nuzzo NATURE
- The fickle P value generates irreproducible results
- (2015) Lewis G Halsey et al. NATURE METHODS
- Does the P Value Have a Future in Plant Pathology?
- (2015) L. V. Madden et al. PHYTOPATHOLOGY
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- A surge ofp-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
- (2015) Joost CF de Winter et al. PeerJ
- The Statistical Crisis in Science
- (2014) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- Rejoinder
- (2014) Paul A. Murtaugh ECOLOGY
- Comment on Murtaugh
- (2014) Michael Lavine ECOLOGY
- ToPor not toP?
- (2014) Jarrett J. Barber et al. ECOLOGY
- In defense ofPvalues
- (2014) Paul A. Murtaugh ECOLOGY
- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Six Persistent Research Misconceptions
- (2014) Kenneth J. Rothman JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- P-values in genomics: Apparent precision masks high uncertainty
- (2014) L C Lazzeroni et al. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
- Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
- (2014) Marcel A. L. M. van Assen et al. PLoS One
- Adaptive revised standards for statistical evidence
- (2014) L. Pericchi et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Revised evidence for statistical standards
- (2014) A. Gelman et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?
- (2014) J. Gaudart et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence
- (2014) V. E. Johnson PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Article Commentary: On the Persistence of Low Power in Psychological Science
- (2014) Ivan Vankov et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Null hypothesis significance tests. A mix-up of two different theories: the basis for widespread confusion and numerous misinterpretations
- (2014) Jesper W. Schneider SCIENTOMETRICS
- How to Make More Published Research True
- (2014) John P. A. Ioannidis PLOS MEDICINE
- An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
- (2014) D. Colquhoun Royal Society Open Science
- How confidence intervals become confusion intervals
- (2013) James McCormack et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Commentary
- (2013) David A. Savitz EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
- (2013) Björn Brembs et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- (2013) Gregory Francis JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Interrogating p-values
- (2013) Andrew Gelman JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Revised standards for statistical evidence
- (2013) V. E. Johnson PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Do We Really Need the S-word?
- (2012) Megan Higgs AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- P-Value Precision and Reproducibility
- (2012) Dennis D. Boos et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian
- (2012) Stuart H. Hurlbert et al. ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI
- Nonsignificance Plus High Power Does Not Imply Support for the Null Over the Alternative
- (2012) Sander Greenland ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Confidence Intervals Make a Difference
- (2012) Rink Hoekstra et al. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
- Living with Statistics in Observational Research
- (2012) Sander Greenland et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Obtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trials
- (2012) Joanna IntHout et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Magnitude of effects in clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals
- (2011) Konstantinos CM Siontis et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Meta-research: The art of getting it wrong
- (2011) John P. A. Ioannidis Research Synthesis Methods
- Issues in information theory-based statistical inference—a commentary from a frequentist’s perspective
- (2010) Roger Mundry BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
- Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse
- (2010) Wolfgang Forstmeier et al. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
- How reliable are scientific studies?
- (2010) Marcus R. Munafò et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Bias in genetic association studies and impact factor
- (2009) M R Munafò et al. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
- The importance of proving the null.
- (2009) C. R. Gallistel PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
- P-Values are Random Variables
- (2008) Duncan J Murdoch et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
- (2008) John P. A. Ioannidis EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
- (2008) Neal S Young et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More