Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

What Happens When Underperforming Big Ideas in Research Become Entrenched?

(2016) Michael J. Joyner et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

The natural selection of bad science

(2016) Paul E. Smaldino et al.   Royal Society Open Science

Replication Validity of Initial Association Studies: A Comparison between Psychiatry, Neurology and Four Somatic Diseases

(2016) Estelle Dumas-Mallet et al.   PLoS One

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

(2015)   SCIENCE

Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement

(2015) Malcolm R. Macleod et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Publication metrics and success on the academic job market

(2014) David van Dijk et al.   CURRENT BIOLOGY

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

(2013) Katherine S. Button et al.   NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE

Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

(2012) C. Glenn Begley et al.   NATURE

Chapter 11: Genome-Wide Association Studies

(2012) William S. Bush et al.   PLoS Computational Biology