Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence

Adaptive revised standards for statistical evidence

(2014) L. Pericchi et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Revised evidence for statistical standards

(2014) A. Gelman et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?

(2014) J. Gaudart et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests

(2013) Valen E. Johnson   ANNALS OF STATISTICS

Revised standards for statistical evidence

(2013) V. E. Johnson   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Assumptions of Expected Benefits in Randomized Phase III Trials Evaluating Systemic Treatments for Cancer

(2012) H. K. Gan et al.   JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Trends in Risks Associated With New Drug Development: Success Rates for Investigational Drugs

(2010) J A DiMasi et al.   CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS

On the use of non-local prior densities in Bayesian hypothesis tests

(2010) Valen E. Johnson et al.   JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY