Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GUT
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 784-790
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2014-09-02
DOI
10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307508
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The impact of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing on colorectal cancer incidence
- (2013) Leonardo Ventura et al. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
- Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy
- (2013) Hermann Brenner et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Use of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programme
- (2013) Jayne Digby et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
- (2012) G Libby et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Impact of the UK colorectal cancer screening pilot studies on incidence, stage distribution and mortality trends
- (2012) Paula L. McClements et al. Cancer Epidemiology
- Comparison between a guaiac and three immunochemical faecal occult blood tests in screening for colorectal cancer
- (2012) J. Faivre et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- A Proposal to Standardize Reporting Units for Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Hemoglobin
- (2012) C. G. Fraser et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Interval cancers in a FOBT-based colorectal cancer population screening programme: implications for stage, gender and tumour site
- (2011) R J C Steele et al. GUT
- Toward standardizing and reporting colorectal cancer screening indicators on an international level: The international colorectal cancer screening network
- (2011) Victoria S. Benson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Coverage and Performance of Colorectal Cancer Screening with the Faecal Occult Blood Test in Finland
- (2011) Nea Malila et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Sex Differences in Performance of Fecal Occult Blood Testing
- (2010) Hermann Brenner et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- High sensitivity of five colorectal screening programmes with faecal immunochemical test in the Veneto Region, Italy
- (2010) M. Zorzi et al. GUT
- Effect of Gender, Age and Deprivation on Key Performance Indicators in a Fobt-based Colorectal Screening Programme
- (2010) R J C Steele et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy
- (2009) L Hol et al. GUT
- Chemotherapy with Targeted Agents for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- (2009) C.-H. Kohne et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests are superior to guaiac-based tests for the detection of colorectal neoplasms
- (2008) Vincent Dancourt et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Random Comparison of Guaiac and Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Population
- (2008) Leo G. van Rossum et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer
- (2008) R J C Steele et al. GUT
- Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Two Areas of Tuscany With Different Screening Exposures
- (2008) Adele Seniori Costantini et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started