A Proposal to Standardize Reporting Units for Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Hemoglobin
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A Proposal to Standardize Reporting Units for Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Hemoglobin
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume 104, Issue 11, Pages 810-814
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2012-04-03
DOI
10.1093/jnci/djs190
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comparative Evaluation of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Adenoma Detection
- (2013) Sabrina Hundt ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Comparing Fecal Immunochemical Tests: Improved Standardization Is Needed
- (2012) James E. Allison et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Test Performance of Immunologic Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Sigmoidoscopy Compared with Primary Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Advanced Adenomas
- (2011) C. A. J. Khalid-de Bakker et al. Cancer Prevention Research
- Do new concepts for deriving permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias have any advantages over existing consensus?
- (2011) Per Hyltoft Petersen et al. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
- Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening by Getting FIT Right
- (2011) Theodore R. Levin GASTROENTEROLOGY
- High Yield of Colorectal Neoplasia Detected by Colonoscopy following a Positive Faecal Occult Blood Test in the Nhs Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
- (2011) Thomas J W Lee et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Fecal Occult Blood Testing When Colonoscopy Capacity is Limited
- (2011) Janneke A. Wilschut et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Screening for colorectal neoplasia with faecal tests
- (2011) Callum G Fraser LANCET ONCOLOGY
- New faecal tests in gastroenterology
- (2011) R. M. Ayling ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
- Metrological traceability in clinical biochemistry
- (2011) G. H. White ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
- Sex Differences in Performance of Fecal Occult Blood Testing
- (2010) Hermann Brenner et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: The Importance of Evidence and Transparency
- (2010) James E. Allison GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district
- (2010) G. Grazzini et al. GUT
- Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best?
- (2010) G. Hoff et al. GUT
- Inter-test agreement and quantitative cross-validation of immunochromatographical fecal occult blood tests
- (2010) Hermann Brenner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Use of faecal markers in screening for colorectal neoplasia: a European group on tumor markers position paper
- (2010) Michael J. Duffy et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme
- (2009) L G M van Rossum et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy
- (2009) L Hol et al. GUT
- Which fecal occult blood test is best to screen for colorectal cancer?
- (2009) Graeme P Young et al. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Cochrane Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test (Hemoccult): An Update
- (2008) Paul Hewitson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Random Comparison of Guaiac and Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Population
- (2008) Leo G. van Rossum et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Faecal occult blood tests – eliminate, enhance or update?
- (2008) Callum G Fraser ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started