4.3 Article

U-Pb zircon dating and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence to support a juvenile origin of the ∼ 634 Ma El Shalul granitic gneiss dome, Arabian-Nubian Shield

Journal

GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 149, Issue 5, Pages 783-797

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0016756811000975

Keywords

Eastern Desert; gneiss dome; geochronology; geochemistry

Funding

  1. UoO grant 'Smaforsk'
  2. NSF [EAR-0804749]
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0821257] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The calc-alkaline, gneissic El Shalul granite is the westernmost gneiss dome or core complex within the Arabian-Nubian Shield. Previous studies have indicated that it represents either a window into the underlying pre-Neoproterozoic Sahara metacraton or a melt derived from the metacraton. U-Pb LA-ICP-MS dating of magmatic zircons from two samples of the variably foliated El Shalul pluton gives ages of 637 +/- 5 Ma and 630 +/- 6 Ma, excluding it from representing exhumed cratonic rocks. The ages are, however, indistinguishable from the age of the Um Ba'anib pluton, constituting the core of the Meatiq Gneiss Dome, as well as several other plutons in the Eastern Desert, indicating an important magmatic pulse in the Arabian-Nubian Shield in Late Cryogenian time. Major and trace element data indicate a within-plate setting. Bulk rock Nd-isotope and Hf-isotope data on zircons from the El Shalul pluton indicate derivation of the primary melt from a relatively juvenile source, either the lower crust of a mid-Neoproterozoic volcanic arc or as a result of fractionation of a mantle-derived mafic melt. Sm-Nd bulk rock isotopic data indicate a model age of c. 720 Ma for the protolith from which the melt was derived. Time-corrected Hf-isotope data obtained on the magmatic zircons indicate that the bulk of the source rock was extracted from the mantle around 810 Ma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available