4.6 Article

Elevated light and nutrients alter the nutritional quality of stream periphyton

Journal

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 7, Pages 1447-1457

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12142

Keywords

fatty acids; food quality; light; nutrients; periphyton

Funding

  1. Sigma
  2. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Fordham University
  3. National Science Foundation [0552630]
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0552630] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biochemical composition of primary food resources may affect secondary production, growth, reproduction and other physiological responses in consumers and may be an important driver of food-web dynamics. Changes in land use, riparian clearing and non-point nutrient inputs to streams have the potential to alter the biochemical composition of periphyton, and characterising this relationship may be critical to understand the processes by which environmental change can affect food webs and ecosystem function. We conducted a manipulative, in situ experiment to examine the effect of light and nutrient availability on stream periphyton biomass, nutrient content, stoichiometry and fatty acid composition. Greater light increased periphyton biomass [chl-a, ash-free dry mass (AFDM)], periphyton carbon concentrations and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), but decreased saturated fatty acids (SAFAs). Greater light availability also increased levels of <20C polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), but decreased quantities of several long-chain (20-22 C), highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFAs). Nutrient (+N, +P) addition had no significant effect on periphyton biomass in the study streams, but did increase periphyton carbon content. For fatty acids, despite non-significant effects on periphyton biomass, nutrient additions resulted in an increased ratio of SAFA to PUFA, greater concentrations of stearidonic acid (18:43) and near-significant increases in -linolenic acid (18:33). Nutrient additions also resulted in decreased quantities of the physiologically important docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:63) and increased the ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids. An interaction between nutrient addition and greater light also resulted in decreased percentages of another physiologically important fatty acid, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:53). Results from this study suggest that increased light and nutrients, a condition common in urban and agricultural catchments, would increase 18C PUFA intermediates that would be available in periphyton food sources, but decrease the availability of essential 20-22C HUFAs. If stream consumers are unable to elongate PUFAs into essential HUFAs, there may be important effects on food webs, including shifts by invertebrate consumers from herbivory to omnivory or carnivory, or changes in the species composition of aquatic consumers. Our results demonstrate that fatty acid measures were more sensitive to changes in light and nutrient conditions than more traditional measures of biomass, nutrient content and stoichiometry. We recommend routine measurement of fatty acid content in monitoring the effect of changing environmental conditions in rivers and streams, particularly studies on food quality and ecosystem health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Review Ecology

How important are terrestrial organic carbon inputs for secondary production in freshwater ecosystems?

Michael T. Brett, Stuart E. Bunn, Sudeep Chandra, Aaron W. E. Galloway, Fen Guo, Martin J. Kainz, Paula Kankaala, Danny C. P. Lau, Timothy P. Moulton, Mary E. Power, Joseph B. Rasmussen, Sami J. Taipale, James H. Thorp, John D. Wehr

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY (2017)

Article Environmental Sciences

Bank-derived material dominates fluvial sediment in a suburban Chesapeake Bay watershed

Matthew J. Cashman, Allen Gellis, Lillian Gorman Sanisaca, Gregory B. Noe, Vanessa Cogliandro, Anna Baker

RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

Trends in the use of large wood in UK river restoration projects: insights from the National River Restoration Inventory

Matthew Joseph Cashman, Geraldene Wharton, Gemma L. Harvey, Marc Naura, Alexandra Bryden

WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL (2019)

Article Environmental Sciences

Linking hydrological connectivity to gully erosion in savanna rangelands tributary to the Great Barrier Reef using structure-from-motion photogrammetry

Jack Koci, Roy C. Sidle, Ben Jarihani, Matthew J. Cashman

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT (2020)

Review Environmental Sciences

Sediment dynamics and implications for management: State of the science from long-term research in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA

Gregory B. Noe, Matthew J. Cashman, Katie Skalak, Allen Gellis, Kristina G. Hopkins, Doug Moyer, James Webber, Adam Benthem, Kelly Maloney, John Brakebill, Andrew Sekellick, Mike Langland, Qian Zhang, Gary Shenk, Jeni Keisman, Cliff Hupp

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER (2020)

Article Geography, Physical

Channel response to a dam-removal sediment pulse captured at high-temporal resolution using routine gage data

Matthew J. Cashman, Allen C. Gellis, Eric Boyd, Mathias J. Collins, Scott W. Anderson, Brett D. McFarland, Ashley M. Ryan

Summary: This study captured the impact of a sediment pulse from dam removal on a river channel, leading to changes in local hydraulics, sediment deposition, and both short-term and long-term effects of the pulse. Additionally, the study highlighted the utility of US Geological Survey gage data in quantifying geomorphic change and providing insights into trajectories of change over varying spatial and temporal scales.

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Linking Altered Flow Regimes to Biological Condition: an Example Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Small Streams of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Kelly Oliver Maloney, Daren Milo Carlisle, Claire Buchanan, Jennifer Lynn Rapp, Samuel Hess Austin, Matthew Joseph Cashman, John Andre Young

Summary: The study found that flow alteration can have negative impacts on the benthic macroinvertebrate condition in small streams. In urban areas, the likelihood of degraded biological conditions due to flow alteration was over twofold higher compared to agricultural areas.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2021)

Article Geography, Physical

Structural complexity influences the ecosystem engineering effects of in-stream large wood

Matthew J. Cashman, Gemma L. Harvey, Geraldene Wharton

Summary: The study examined the structural complexity and ecosystem engineering effects of large wood jams at four sites with varying management intensity, revealing that natural jams and sites with low riparian management intensity had the highest complexity and volume of jams. Structural complexity was found to influence the ecosystem engineering role of large wood, with more complex jams generating greater effects on flow hydraulics and sediment characteristics. The study presents a conceptual model for evaluating sites along the management intensity spectrum to inform restoration design and best practice.

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Using fish community and population indicators to assess the biological condition of streams and rivers of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA

Kelly O. Maloney, Kevin P. Krause, Matthew J. Cashman, Wesley M. Daniel, Benjamin P. Gressler, Daniel J. Wieferich, John A. Young

Summary: The development of indicators to assess freshwater condition is crucial. Predictive modeling can enhance indicators by estimating condition for unsurveyed locations. Community and species-level analyses provide a holistic view of habitat conditions. Combining these approaches allows direct comparisons and addresses the limitations of each method.

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS (2022)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

An assessment of marine, estuarine, and riverine habitat vulnerability to climate change in the Northeast US

Emily R. Farr, Michael R. Johnson, Mark W. Nelson, Jonathan A. Hare, Wendy E. Morrison, Matthew D. Lettrich, Bruce Vogt, Christopher Meaney, Ursula A. Howson, Peter J. Auster, Frank A. Borsuk, Damian C. Brady, Matthew J. Cashman, Phil Colarusso, Jonathan H. Grabowski, James P. Hawkes, Renee Mercaldo-Allen, David B. Packer, David K. Stevenson

Summary: Climate change is impacting marine, coastal, and diadromous species habitats, exacerbating anthropogenic stressors faced by habitats. A trait-based assessment revealed that living habitats are the most vulnerable, with over half of habitats expected to be negatively impacted by climate change. Results provide tools for informing habitat conservation, restoration, and research priorities, fisheries and protected species management, and coastal and ocean planning.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?

Richard H. Walker, Matthew J. Ashton, Matthew J. Cashman, Rosemary M. Fanelli, Kevin P. Krause, Gregory B. Noe, Kelly O. Maloney

Summary: This study utilized structural equation modeling to analyze the important predictors driving benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage condition, finding that the effects of landscape, land use, and water quality differed temporally.

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Identifying Key Stressors Driving Biological Impairment in Freshwater Streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA

Rosemary M. Fanelli, Matthew J. Cashman, Aaron J. Porter

Summary: Biological communities in freshwater streams are often affected by multiple stressors originating from human activities. This study reviewed published studies and analyzed regulatory agency data to identify the most important stressors causing biological impairment. Geomorphology, salinity, and toxic contaminants were found to be important factors explaining variability in benthic community metrics. These findings can assist resource managers in prioritizing stressor monitoring and improving methods for identifying causes of biological impairment.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2022)

Correction Environmental Sciences

Identifying Key Stressors Driving Biological Impairment in Freshwater Streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA (vol 70, pg 926, 2022)

Rosemary M. Fanelli, Matthew J. Cashman, Aaron J. Porter

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2023)

Article Environmental Sciences

Explainable machine learning improves interpretability in the predictive modeling of biological stream conditions in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA

Kelly O. Maloney, Claire Buchanan, Rikke D. Jepsen, Kevin P. Krause, Matthew J. Cashman, Benjamin P. Gressler, John A. Young, Matthias Schmid

Summary: Anthropogenic alterations have led to widespread degradation of stream conditions. A random forest model was used to predict the biological conditions of small streams in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The model identified the impacts of forest, development, and agriculture in upstream catchments on stream conditions. The use of global and local interpretative methods improved the understanding of these impacts.

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2022)

Article Water Resources

Quantifying connectivity and its effects on sediment budgeting for an agricultural basin, Chesapeake Bay Watershed, United States

Zachary J. Clifton, Matthew J. Cashman, Allen C. Gellis, Michelle P. Katoski, Lucas A. Nibert, Gregory B. Noe

Summary: This study used a sediment budget approach to determine the sources, storage, and delivery of sediment in the Smith Creek watershed. The results showed that streambanks and pastures were major sources of sediment. The study also indicated that the storage of sediment in the watershed may have been underestimated due to unaccounted geomorphic features. The findings provide a framework for managers to address the sediment problem in Smith Creek and similar tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay.

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES (2022)

No Data Available