4.7 Article

Volatile analysis of spoiled, artisan-type, modified-atmosphere-packaged cooked ham stored under different temperatures

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 94-102

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.08.005

Keywords

Cooked ham; Spoilage; Gas chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Static headspace; SPME

Funding

  1. Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  2. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO)
  3. Encourage rnent of Scientific and Technological Research in the Industry (IWT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolite production due to bacterial outgrowth and oxidation phenomena lead to spoilage development of cooked ham. Artisan-type products, with low salt concentrations and a minimum of additives, are particularly sensitive. Cold chain variations related to distribution and consumer habits have a negative influence on the shelf-life. In this study, sliced, modified atmosphere packaged artisan-type cooked ham was stored at different temperatures (4, 7,12, and 26 degrees C). The evolution of volatiles over time for the different storage temperatures was monitored with static headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SH-GC-MS). The latter method was compared to solid phase microextraction (SPME). Several of the detected compounds could be ascribed to bacterial glucose and amino acid metabolism and their production was related to the storage temperature. The compounds 3-methyl butanol and ethanol were related with bacterial cell growth. Maillard-derived compounds, leading to the formation of furans, probably originated from endogenous reactions during cooking. Several detected aliphatic compounds probably originated from fatty acid oxidation reactions, including thermal fit degradation, chemical auto-oxidation, and enzymatic beta-oxidation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available