4.7 Article

Comparison of analytical methods to assay inhibitors of angiotensin I-converting enzyme

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 141, Issue 4, Pages 3329-3334

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.048

Keywords

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE); Captopril; Hip-His-Leu (HHL); Visible spectrophotometric (VSP) method; High performance liquid chromatography (H PLC) method

Funding

  1. National High Science and Technology (863) Key Program [2010AA023003]
  2. 111 Project [B07029]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [NYCYTX-49]
  4. Young and Middle-aged Talent Project in Hubei Province [Q20091808]
  5. [PCSIRT0627]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The linearity, precision and repeatability of visible spectrophotometric (VSP) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for analysis of inhibitory activity of angiotensin 1-converting enzyme (ACE) were compared by using several inhibitors and Hip-His-Leu (HHL) as substrates. IC50 values (concentration at which ACE activity is inhibited by 50%) of 0.00206 +/- 0.00005 mu g/mL for captopril, 192 +/- 4.53 mu g/mL for soybean peptides, and 153 +/- 4.29 mu g/mL for grass carp peptides determined by the VSP method, and these values were 1.07, 1.07, 1.18 and 1.44-fold, respectively, higher than those from the HPLC method. In addition, the inhibitory constant (K-i value) of captopril was determined to be 7.09 nM and 4.94 nM using VSP and HPLC method, respectively. These results showed that the HPLC method revealed a higher level of sensitivity and precision, suitable for assaying ACE inhibition activity of antihyper-sensitive peptides. In contrast, the VSP method can simultaneously measure several samples with simple operations, suitable for analysis of ACE inhibition activity of food protein enzymatic hydrolysates. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available